Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Government Procedures topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Supervisors create ad hoc committee to review county flag‑flying requests amid concerns about forum rules

5766353 · August 12, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The Board created a two‑member ad hoc committee to review requests to fly commemorative flags on county property and recommend policy changes. The committee will be chaired by Supervisor Guardia with Supervisor Dhaliwal as a member; board counsel warned adding non‑supervisors would trigger Brown Act requirements.

The San Joaquin County Board of Supervisors on Aug. 12 voted to form a two‑member ad hoc committee to review and recommend updates to the county’s flag‑flying policy after months of public debate over commemorative flags.

Supervisor Guardia said the panel should explore ways to streamline the process and make decisions more equitable following requests and public discussion about flying commemorative flags. He asked the board to form a short‑term group to evaluate options.

During discussion several supervisors raised concerns about opening flag policy to unrestricted public requests, noting the possibility that once a process is opened, groups with controversial or hateful viewpoints might seek the same platform. County counsel clarified that an ad hoc committee composed solely of county supervisors does not trigger Brown Act meeting requirements, but that including non‑supervisors or outside members would convert the group into a public body subject to open‑meeting rules.

Supervisor Deane moved to form the ad hoc committee with Supervisor Guardia and Supervisor Dhaliwal serving; Supervisor Gardia (Guardia/Gardia spelling varies in the record) would chair. The motion passed on a 4–1 vote.

County counsel advised the committee to keep its work focused on policy options that preserve the county’s ability to exercise content and viewpoint‑neutral rules while avoiding creating an open public forum that could obligate the county to host any flag request. The committee will return to the full board with recommendations about clarifying the request process, approval thresholds and any legal safeguards the board should adopt.