Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Design Review topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Kuna planning commission approves design review for Mark Adams' generator storage building
Summary
The Kuna City Planning and Zoning Commission approved design review case 25-17-DR on Aug. 12 to allow a 36-by-70 post-frame building for business storage of large generator equipment at 16 East Stagecoach Way and South Swan Falls, subject to conditions in the staff report.
The Kuna City Planning and Zoning Commission on Aug. 12 approved design review case 25-17-DR, allowing a 36-by-70 post-frame (pole-style) outbuilding at 16 East Stagecoach Way and South Swan Falls for business storage of large generator equipment. The commission voted unanimously to approve the application with the conditions listed in the staff report.
Troy Beheunen, senior planner with Kuna City Development Services, told commissioners the application had been reviewed for compliance with the Kuna City Code and the Kuna Comprehensive Plan and that staff recommended approval with the conditions in its report. Beheunen said the facility would not be used for public storage but rather as an accessory building for the applicant’s business.
The applicant’s representative, identified only as Daniel (address given on the record), said the building would be used to store and work on large commercial generator packages and related parts that arrive by semi; he said there would be no fuels stored inside the building. Daniel described the structure as a post-frame building with insulation and increased interior clearance to allow technicians to stand and to pull vehicles or equipment inside.
Commissioners asked clarifying questions about the change from residential to commercial use and the building’s construction. Beheunen said the design review was evaluating the building design and that other code compliance items tied to the change of use would be handled through staff processes and conditions listed in the staff report.
Following a brief deliberation in which commissioners said they saw no material issues with the design, a motion to approve case 25-17-DR with the staff-recommended conditions was made and seconded. The commission called for the question; the vote was recorded as unanimous in favor and the motion passed.
There were no other substantive agenda items or public comments related to this case. The commission accepted staff’s report, closed the item, and adjourned the meeting.
