Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Appointments Policy topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Council confirms Recreation and Parks nominee amid debate on commissioner candidacy policy
Summary
Robert Nizic was confirmed to the Recreation and Parks Commission following council debate about whether commissioners should resign when they run for elective office and whether appointments reflect geographic balance.
The Los Angeles City Council confirmed Robert Nizic to the Recreation and Parks Commission on July 14 after an extended floor debate about council policy for commission appointments and geographic representation.
Council Member Sibornich (spoke during the debate) said he would bring a motion for a formal council policy next week, arguing the council should not be a “routine rubber stamp” for mayoral appointments and that commissioners who run for elective office historically have resigned their posts. He said past practice included resignations when commissioners qualified as candidates. Council Member Sibornich said the policy discussion should go to committee so the council could decide whether to require resignations in future cases.
Council Member Sobornich and others urged an up-or-down vote on the current nominee rather than holding the nomination for policy changes. Council Member Hernandez said serving on commissions can give appointees experience that later benefits the city in elected office and that some commissioners who ran for office did not resign before being elected in past administrations.
Council Member Walters said her earlier concern was not with the absence of a written council policy but with understanding the mayor’s policy and how it had been applied to prior appointments. Other council members called for a balanced approach and noted the charter changes that created new seats and geographic considerations for some proprietary boards.
After discussion, the council voted (recorded as 8 ayes, 4 noes) to confirm Nizic. Several council members said they would pursue a written policy on appointments to address conflicts between candidacy and commission service.
Why it matters: The debate focused on procedural fairness and the appearance of political advantage when commissioners run for elective office while serving on civic boards. The discussion prompted a pledged follow-up on formalizing policy and on ensuring geographic representation across commissions.
Speakers who addressed this item included Council Member Sibornich, Council Member Hernandez, Council Member Walters and Council Member Ferraro; the confirmation itself was recorded by the clerk and entered into the public record.
