Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Planning commission directs environmental review for Fairview Developmental Center; adds study of extra access point, sends recommendation to council

5681376 · August 26, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The Costa Mesa Planning Commission voted 5-1 on Aug. 25, 2025 to recommend that the City Council authorize environmental review of a draft preferred land-use plan for the Fairview Developmental Center specific plan. The recommended EIR project description directs study of a minimum 2,300 dwelling units and directs staff to test up to 4,000 units for EIR purposes, plus a 12-acre public-open-space minimum and other plan parameters.

On Aug. 25, 2025, the Costa Mesa Planning Commission voted 5-1 to recommend that the City Council authorize environmental review (an EIR) for a draft preferred land-use plan for the Fairview Developmental Center (FDC) specific plan. Commissioner Dixon made the motion; Commissioner Andrade seconded. Vice Chair Zick cast the lone no vote. The commission's recommendation identifies a study envelope (the project description for the EIR) that includes a minimum of 2,300 dwelling units (the site's capacity in the adopted housing element) and directs staff to study up to 4,000 dwelling units for environmental purposes; it also specifies a minimum of 12 acres of publicly accessible open space, a maximum of 35,000 square feet of mixed-use commercial, and retains flexibility in the plan's standards. Commissioners additionally asked staff to analyze a potential third access point from the Shelley Circle/Placentia direction to help evaluate circulation and mitigation options.

What staff presented: Carrie Tai (City director assigned to the project) and the consultant team, including Suzanne Schwab and Karen Gully, summarized outreach to date, prior study-session feedback, and the reasons for a broad project-description envelope. Staff cited three recurring public concerns: development range (number of dwelling units),…

Already have an account? Log in

Subscribe to keep reading

Unlock the rest of this article — and every article on Citizen Portal.

  • Unlimited articles
  • AI-powered breakdowns of topics, speakers, decisions, and budgets
  • Instant alerts when your location has a new meeting
  • Follow topics and more locations
  • 1,000 AI Insights / month, plus AI Chat
30-day money-back on paid plans