Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Code Enforcement topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Council broadens ‘responsible person’ definition for code enforcement to include managers, contractors and occupants
Summary
By unanimous vote, the Yucaipa City Council amended the municipal code to expand the definition of a 'responsible person' for code enforcement to include property managers, contractors, short‑term rental hosts, business operators, homeowners associations and family members exercising control over a property.
The Yucaipa City Council unanimously approved an amendment to the municipal code on Aug. 25 that expands who can be cited as a "responsible person" for violations handled by code enforcement.
City Attorney Steven Graham presented Ordinance No. 463 as a limited, targeted change to Section 1.12.0.01 of the municipal code. The current code defines a responsible person as the property owner, a tenant, a person with a legal interest in real property, or a person in possession of real property. The amendment adds several new categories that staff said would help direct enforcement at the party actually controlling or creating nuisances.
New categories and rationale The ordinance adds as potentially responsible parties: property managers or management companies with contractual or actual authority over the property; contractors, subcontractors or developers performing work that creates a nuisance; operators or hosts of short‑term rentals; business operators or franchisees conducting operations on the property; homeowners associations or similar entities responsible for maintaining common areas; and family members, caretakers or other occupants who exercise control over the property.
Graham said the change responds to situations in which an elderly property owner may be cited even though another occupant or caretaker actually controls the property and can correct violations. "The goal here is to put additional tools in the toolbox for our code enforcement to make sure that we are holding those individuals responsible who are actually creating the nuisances in our community," Graham told the council.
Vote and implementation Council Member Miller moved to approve the ordinance and Council Member Woolsey seconded. The roll-call vote was unanimous: Bieber — yes; Miller — yes; Woolsey — yes; Venable — yes; Thorpe — yes. The council carried the ordinance as drafted; staff said the change would allow code enforcement to issue citations to the appropriate responsible party and would be applied through existing enforcement procedures.
Ending The code amendment is intended to give enforcement staff additional options to address nuisances and to direct remedies to the party able to correct conditions. Further policy decisions about enforcement priorities and program resources remain at council discretion.
