Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Historic Markers topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Middleburg Museum and Civic Center marker moves forward as researchers seek WPA documentation
Summary
Middleburg Museum representatives and board staff said they have combined applications for a marker that would recognize both the museum and the adjacent civic center; researchers identified newspaper accounts and deeds that may link the buildings to WPA projects, but exact construction dates remain unclear.
Middleburg Museum leaders told the Clay County Historic Preservation Board they have revised a marker application so one marker would commemorate both the Middleburg Museum and the adjoining civic association building.
Ruth Payne, president of the Middleburg Museum, said the original application submitted in October 2023 described only the museum but the applicants later determined the museum and the civic association could be combined on a single marker. “I presented the application and sent it to miss Carson, that was in October 2023,” Payne said, adding the group has updated the application to reflect combined purposes.
Jerry, a county staff member working with applicants, said the office likely has enough information to modify the original submission: “I think by now, we have enough information, but, of course, it involves consolidating information about the 2 different ones into 1 marker.”
Museum volunteers and staff reported new documentary leads tying the buildings to Works Progress Administration work in the 1930s. Payne said she located contemporary newspaper articles listing a Middleburg community center among WPA projects and that at least one article names a completion date in 1937; other sources, including a later local column, indicate 1938. The board discussed those discrepancies and agreed to avoid asserting a single firm completion year on the marker text until staff can confirm records.
Payne asked staff for help locating deeds: county staff confirmed a 1963 deed recorded by a widow of a former landowner appears in archives and that staff will examine it to reconcile questions about land conveyance and construction phases.
Board members also urged applicants to prepare marker text and supporting documentation in the application packet. Staff said they will produce an aerial map with a proposed sign location and provide GPS coordinates to ensure the marker sits outside public-right-of-way.
Separately, board members were told the State Review Board has rescheduled the Brannonfield outlying field marker review to a future date (staff later said it is set for Monday the 18th from 2 to 4 p.m.), and the board discussed Fort No. 11, where locating precise fort remains has been hindered by private property and limited archaeological access.
The board requested staff follow up on deed images, newspaper documentation and the state review schedule so applicants can finalize marker language for the county application and potential future state submission.
