Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Rezoning 5108 Reed Street topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Council lays over rezoning request for 5108 Reed Street after neighbors raise maintenance and density concerns
Summary
The council delayed action for one week on a proposal to rezone 5108 Reed Street from R-2 to R-4 so the owner and neighbors can discuss property maintenance and project details. Planning Board had recommended R-4; neighbors opposed splitting the lot.
Get email alerts on the Rezoning 5108 Reed Street topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Omaha City Council on July 31 voted 4–2 to lay over a rezoning request for 5108 Reed Street to allow the applicant to meet with neighbors and resolve concerns over property maintenance and density.
Owner Freddie Ellis told the council he plans to subdivide the parcel and build two single-family homes for sale. Ellis said financing is in place and that he intends to begin construction “within the next one or two months.” He also said he has arranged for more frequent lawn maintenance while the subdivision process proceeds.
Neighbors said they were not fully informed and raised objections during public comment. Anne Kotorous, who lives within 300 feet of the site, provided photographs and asked the council not to split the lot, saying the neighborhood features larger lots, mature trees and single-family ranch homes. Scott Tunstall, who lives directly north of the parcel, said adding two homes would feel like the properties were being placed "right on top of me" and cited concerns about congestion and loss of neighborhood character. Larry Storer and other residents expressed broader concerns about incremental density reductions in single-family neighborhoods.
Planning staff and council discussion Planning Manager Michael Carter told the council that the Planning Board and Planning Department recommended approval of rezoning to R-4 (the applicant’s original request for R-5 was denied by Planning). Carter said R-4 and R-5 would both be master-plan compliant, and that the R-4 recommendation was reached to allow the lot reconfiguration that creates two buildable lots.
Council members pressed the applicant about property maintenance and neighbor outreach. Council Member Goodwin recommended a layover to give the applicant time to make contact with neighbors and mitigate concerns; Goodwin said that doing so could build goodwill and reduce opposition. Council Member Harding noted planning-board review had already occurred and questioned whether a layover would change substantive facts; others argued the short delay could improve communication.
Vote and next steps The roll call on the motion to lay over the rezoning for one week was: - Melton: Yes - Roe: No - Goodwin: Yes - Harding: No - Hugg: Yes - Council President: Yes Motion passed 4–2.
The council asked Ellis to maintain the property and meet with neighbors in the coming week. Planning staff advised the applicant that administrative processes (lot splits, setbacks) and technical requirements remain in place; the applicant said he needs the council action to obtain addresses required by his lender for appraisal and financing milestones.
Why it matters Rezoning and lot-split decisions change what can be built on a parcel and can affect neighborhood character, parking and traffic patterns. Here, neighbors said the existing lot and its vegetation contribute to the block’s character; the applicant said he will build two single-family homes, not multi-family units.
What’s next The council will revisit the rezoning at its next meeting (one week from July 31). The applicant and neighbors were encouraged to meet before that hearing so councilors can consider whether outstanding concerns have been addressed.

