Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Rule Cka Firearms topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
District advances draft of firearms rule CKA; trustees add signage language, ammunition controls and plan executive‑session legal review
Summary
The board reviewed a revised Rule CKA (weapons on school property) to align with state law; trustees asked for modest signage discouraging concealed carry, added ammunition‑control language and scheduled attorney‑client discussion before final approval.
Uinta County School District #1 staff presented a revised draft of Rule CKA, the district rule governing weapons and concealed carry on school property, and described changes made to comply with recent state statutory changes. Trustees discussed legal authority, training requirements for authorized employees and volunteers, ammunition handling and signage.
Why it matters: The rewrite responds to state law changes and to public comments received during the rule’s comment period. The district sought input from local law enforcement and legal counsel and is balancing statutory minimums with district safety concerns.
Key points of the draft and board discussion
Staff said the original district rule was developed under a now‑repealed statutory provision (21‑3‑132) and that the new statute (referred to in discussion as 68‑105) requires the district to operate under a different statutory framework; the draft has been adjusted accordingly. District counsel and staff reviewed comments from a public commenter and compared other districts’ policies (notably Teton County) as part of the revision process.
The board discussed and the draft now includes three notable provisions described by staff:
- A signage statement asking parents and visitors not to carry a concealed weapon on district property. The suggested language reads in staff’s draft: “To assure student safety, parents and/or visitors to the district are respectfully asked not to carry a concealed weapon on school property.” Trustees debated whether such language both expresses policy and inadvertently alerts out‑of‑state visitors to their legal ability to carry; the draft keeps the wording but the board directed careful signage wording and placement.
- Ammunition controls: staff said local law enforcement recommended the district purchase and approve the specific ammunition authorized for daily carry on district property to ensure rounds meet FBI penetration guidance. The draft specifies that ammunition for on‑duty concealed carry will be inspected and approved by district‑approved advisors and “will not exceed FBI standards for penetration.” Staff also said the district will pay for training and related district‑required items (for example, a concealed safe/lockbox) while employees will cover firearms and personal holsters.
- Training and application process: staff emphasized the district retains discretion to authorize or deny permission to carry and that training, certification and recertification requirements meet or exceed the statutory minimums. The board discussed the administrative burden and whether training requirements should exceed statutory minimums; trustees left that as an administrative discretion but affirmed scenario‑based training with local law enforcement.
Legal review and next steps
Trustees agreed to discuss some legal concerns in executive session with counsel (attorney‑client privilege) before moving to formal adoption. Staff said they will amend the draft to reflect board input, include the signage language and the ammunition/inspection language, and return for formal consideration at a subsequent meeting. The board did not adopt the rule at the meeting.
Ending
The board asked staff to provide a final draft after the executive‑session legal review; trustees emphasized they wish to protect student safety while remaining within statutory authority.
