Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Student Pregnancy Accommodations topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Council Rock panel revises pregnant and parenting student policy to expand accommodations
Summary
The Council Rock School District policy committee reviewed updates to Policy 234 to remove married-student language, clarify accommodations for pregnant and parenting students and say staff must provide accommodations once the district is made aware — without requiring a doctor’s note.
The Council Rock School District Policy Committee on Monday reviewed revisions to Policy 2-34, “Pregnant, Parenting and Married Students,” removing married students from that particular policy and specifying that the district must provide accommodations for pregnant and parenting students once it is made aware of their needs.
The committee heard that the policy change narrows the policy’s substantive focus to pregnant and parenting students while adding marital status to other nondiscrimination policies. “Married students are being removed from this policy, particularly because this policy focuses substantively on accommodations for pregnant and parenting students,” a staff member presenting the changes said.
The draft also reflects a recent change in law that, the presenter said, shifts the burden away from students and staff to obtain a doctor’s note. “The law has changed whereby if someone isn’t pregnant and needs accommodations, we are required to provide them even without a doctor's note,” the presenter said, explaining the district will offer common accommodations based on the individual’s needs.
School board member Michael Roosevelt asked whether the district must be notified before accommodations begin; the presenter and Superintendent Andy Sanko responded that the district must know a student is pregnant in order to provide accommodations and that notification may come from the student, parents or a medical provider. Sanko said counselors may disclose confidential information when a student’s health or safety is at risk, but the committee debated whether explicit language about parental notification belongs in this policy or in the district’s confidentiality policy.
The committee discussed interplay with Policy 2-07 (confidentiality) and a reference to "42 PA" about rights for 18-year-old students; presenters said the confidentiality policy previously considered by the board governs disclosure when health or safety is at issue. The committee did not adopt new language about mandatory parental notification during the meeting; members said they would consult the district counsel and the confidentiality policy to resolve the overlap.
The committee also reiterated that the district typically assists families in locating alternative education when a student is suspended or expelled, and that most suspension or expulsion consequences fall well below a 30‑day timeframe except for certain offenses (for example, the presenter noted a one‑year exclusion under state law for weapons violations).
The committee flagged remaining questions for staff: whether explicit parental‑notification language should be added to a companion policy on confidentiality and how the district will document and apply accommodations when no written medical note is provided. The item will return for further review.
