Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Comprehensive Plan topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Plan committee reviews Homeplace sub‑area draft; asks staff for edits and to return Nov. 4
Summary
Committee reviewed the draft Homeplace sub‑area plan, asked for revisions (remove or broaden references to charter school/educational uses, remove illustrative images, add clarifying language and definition boxes), and asked staff to update the draft and return to committee on Nov. 4 for further review.
The Carmel Plan Committee conducted a line‑by‑line review of the draft Homeplace sub‑area plan on Sept. 30 and directed staff to make multiple clarifying edits before the next committee meeting.
Adrienne Keeling of the Department of Community Services led the committee through the draft. Committee members requested removal or broadening of specific references to a “charter school” at the former Orchard Park Elementary site, recommending language such as “early learning center” or leaving the reference more generic to avoid prematurely endorsing a specific use.
On imagery and illustrative material, multiple committee members said several of the plan’s conceptual illustrations and time‑phased renderings were either confusing or potentially misleading. The committee asked staff to remove certain illustrative pages (several members identified pages 22–26) or relabel them prominently with a watermark such as “conceptual/possible” and to add a short explanatory sidebar or definitions page to define terms used in the plan (for example, “cottage retail” or “neighborhood retail”). A committee member suggested replacing specific current business names on maps with gray building footprints and a legend identifying those as existing uses rather than naming businesses directly.
Committee members also discussed street typologies and how sidewalks and proposed lanes should be represented. Staff explained the methodology: streets with existing sidewalks were proposed as “neighborhood streets,” and streets without sidewalks were often shown as “lanes” to preserve existing character while prioritizing strategic sidewalk connections in the future.
The committee asked for a rendering showing the 116th Street ramp and handrail details on Jackson’s Grant (related item), an index or single‑page map listing neighborhood names (several citizens and correspondents had supplied neighborhood names), and clearer labeling that the plan’s concepts do not automatically change zoning or fund projects. Several members proposed adding a page that explicitly lists definitions and a short disclaimer that the plan is conceptual and that “recommendations described by a sub area plan require further action to be implemented.”
Keeling said staff will incorporate the requested edits and return with a revised draft to the committee; members set Nov. 4 as the target date for the next committee review. No final committee vote to adopt the Homeplace sub‑area plan occurred; staff will circulate a revised draft for committee review prior to any further action.
