Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Lighting On Private Property topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
IVCSD explores lighting grants, private‑property fixtures to brighten dark blocks
Summary
The committee reviewed a proposed program to fund or grant lighting on private buildings and yards to improve public safety in poorly lit Isla Vista streets, and discussed partnering with energy providers and environmental groups.
Get email alerts on the Lighting On Private Property topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Isla Vista Community Services District policy committee discussed a new initiative to increase lighting on private property where public street lighting is absent or inadequate, with the goal of improving visibility on pedestrian routes and in known dark spots.
Jenna, a staff member who presented the item, said much of Isla Vista’s brighter corridors — such as Abrego Street — benefit from lighting installed on private buildings and that targeted private‑property lighting could reproduce that effect in darker neighborhoods. Jenna described three program options: distributing standard outdoor‑rated fixtures for property owners to install and maintain; a non‑installed option such as string or solar yard lights for front yards; and a lighting‑upgrade grant program similar to the district’s mural grants that would require applicants to submit plans for review and prioritization based on potential public benefit.
Committee members suggested combining approaches to fit different property types (for example, full fixtures for larger complexes and string or solar lights for smaller rental houses). They recommended prioritizing installations that shine light downward and onto building façades so the reflected light improves adjacent sidewalks. Members also urged staff to consult technical and funding partners: Southern California Edison and the Community Environmental Council were both suggested as potential technical resources or funding partners, and staff noted past regional efforts such as the South Coast Energy Efficiency Partnership as reference material.
Speakers flagged implementation limits: the proposed program would fund lights on private property, not public right‑of‑way street lights controlled by the county; committee members noted the county had previously allocated money for street lighting but had been slow to spend it. Jenna and others said the program could be positioned as a complementary, immediate option while county or university street‑lighting projects proceed. The committee asked staff to map dark blocks (Jenna has done a lighting study) and to identify priority streets — discussion named Picasso, the northern portion of Embarcadero Del Norte, Salvador, Trigo, Pescadero, Delta and the corner near the former Peter Pit — so grant funding would be targeted to areas with the greatest public benefit.
Staff said they would refine the proposal, include findings from the lighting study and bring information about potential partners and estimated costs to a future committee meeting.

