Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Sign Code topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Planning commission begins phased update of sign code; staff cites Supreme Court and recent cases as constraints
Summary
City staff introduced a phased process to update North Bend’s sign code, aiming to modernize definitions, exemptions, prohibitions and design standards. Staff highlighted two court decisions and plans to collect business feedback and hold a public hearing in the months ahead.
The North Bend Planning Commission opened a multi‑phase review of the city’s sign code, with staff outlining a schedule, legal constraints and a stakeholder outreach plan. Staff said the current sign code needs modernization and clearer definitions to reflect newer sign types, enforcement needs and recent legal precedent.
“In general, we anticipate just introducing the topic, answering some general questions, and providing some resources so that you are as informed as possible, for future discussions that will be happening around the sign code,” said Paige Robbins, a planning intern assisting the project team.
Staff said the review will proceed in phases. Phase 1 covers definitions, signs that should be exempt, and prohibitions; Phase 2 will address design standards (size, placement, number of sides) and temporary-sign allowances—where the city currently sees most violations. Staff plans a short business survey and outreach to downtown merchants before drafting formal amendments for Planning Commission review.
Staff identified two court decisions as the most relevant legal precedents staff will account for: the U.S. Supreme Court’s 2015 Reed v. Town of Gilbert decision (which requires sign regulations to be content neutral) and a 2022 case involving the City of Austin and a national advertising company (noted in staff materials) establishing that content-neutral placement regulations can be permissible. Staff also placed the city’s draft definitions and examples in comparative context with other jurisdictions and suggested adding photos and a visual guide to clarify terms.
Commissioners asked how the draft will treat portable sandwich-board (A-frame) signs, historic downtown landmark signs and electronic signage. Staff said durable exemptions, nonconforming sign rules and a possible landmark-preservation pathway (for downtown signs that contribute to historic character) are being considered; the King County Landmarks Commission remains involved for designated historic commercial signs.
Staff proposed a timeline that includes an introductory presentation to the commission, outreach to the business community, draft amendments in September, further hearings in October and November, and possible council adoption by January or February of the following year. The commission did not take formal action at the introduction; staff will return with draft language and a business survey.
