Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Parks Recreation topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Council picks near‑term dog‑park strategy: build small neighborhood parks and design Lakeview Parkway regional park
Summary
After reviewing a public outreach‑led master plan, the Provo City Council Sept. 23 approved a phased dog‑park strategy: immediate work on two smaller neighborhood parks (Rock Canyon and Raw/Exchange) and design work for a larger regional dog park at Lakeview Parkway; the motion passed 5–2.
Parks staff and consultants presented a draft Dog Park Master Plan Sept. 23 and the council gave direction to start smaller neighborhood projects and continue design work for a larger regional park at Lakeview Parkway.
Parks superintendent James Cornaby and consultant Brent Otto (Blue Line Designs) summarized public outreach and site screening. Respondents expressed priorities for fenced areas, shade, water, and waste collection; their top concerns were aggressive dogs, attentive owners and ongoing maintenance. The consultant presented a set of candidate sites and recommended two near‑term, lower‑cost neighborhood builds (Raw/Exchange and Rock Canyon) because those sites are smaller, require less infrastructure, and fit a near‑term budget. Blue Line also presented a larger regional option at Lakeview Parkway (south side of Lakeview Parkway near 1100 West) that would be costlier but provide multiple fenced areas, parking and room for circulation and programming.
Council debate balanced neighborhood concerns (encroachment, proximity to residences) and citywide distribution. Several council members said a mix of neighborhood parks and a large regional park would meet citywide demand and provide experimental, lower‑cost pilots that would inform larger investments. Councilor Hanley moved a substitute motion to build the neighborhood sites (Raw/Exchange and Rock Canyon) as near‑term projects and to advance design for the Lakeview Parkway regional dog park; Councilor Whipple seconded the substitute. The substitute motion passed 5–2.
Parks staff said funding for the smaller parks could be covered in the current capital program and that design funds for the larger Lakeview Parkway park could be pursued in upcoming CIP cycles. Staff also noted the need to finalize operational details — maintenance levels, hours, rules enforcement and sanitation — and said the master plan anticipates phased design and construction as funds become available.
Why it matters: dog parks are high‑use neighborhood amenities that require ongoing maintenance and enforcement. Council direction balances neighborhood concerns with citywide distribution and identifies a path for near‑term pilots and a more ambitious regional facility.
What happens next: Parks staff will program the two neighborhood sites into the near‑term capital plan to begin design and permitting and will pursue design funding for the Lakeview Parkway regional concept in the next CIP process. Staff will return with scope, budget and schedules.
