Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Dangerous Dog Ordinance Review topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Council reviews dangerous-dog ordinances and police procedures; staff recommends some changes
Summary
Staff reviewed city policies, the municipal code and state statutes on dangerous and potentially dangerous dogs, reported current caseloads and recommended procedural improvements including added photo documentation and vaccination requirements for dogs deemed potentially dangerous.
City staff presented a review of municipal code and police procedures related to dangerous and potentially dangerous dogs and discussed possible changes to strengthen recordkeeping and public protections.
The police and animal-control review concluded the department’s policies and local code meet professional standards, but staff recommended several procedural improvements prompted by a recent incident. Staff said they began adding photographs to case files and advised on microchipping and vaccination procedures for dogs deemed potentially dangerous.
Staff reported caseload numbers: four dogs on the dangerous/potentially dangerous list for 2025 and 18 for 2024. Historical caseloads were described as variable, with highs around 22 in a year and lows in single digits. Staff summarized post-determination requirements for dogs deemed dangerous, including covered kennels with sides embedded into the ground, signage, childproof kennels, muzzling and a maximum 3-foot tether when off premises.
Council discussed whether to require spay/neuter or vaccination at the time a dog is deemed potentially dangerous; staff said vaccination requirements can be recommended and that microchipping and photos would be added to file practices. No formal ordinance amendments were adopted at the meeting; the council reviewed policy options and directed staff to continue compiling information.
