Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Assessment And Accountability topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
District 196 outlines FastBridge rollout and spring screening results; reading and math show mixed trends
Summary
District administrators presented spring FastBridge universal screening data during the June 23 meeting, described curriculum implementation effects, and said the district will expand FastBridge K'10 next year and equip teachers with data protocols.
District 196 administrators briefed the school board June 23 on spring universal screening data from FastBridge and the district's plan to use those results to guide instruction.
Steven Belcamp, the district's incoming coordinator of research, assessment and analytics, said the district is in its second year using FastBridge for elementary literacy (K—) and its first year using FastBridge for elementary math. Belcamp emphasized FastBridge's predictive relationship with the Minnesota Comprehensive Assessments (MCA) and said the tool will help the district monitor both core-instruction effectiveness and individual student risk.
Key district-level figures presented for K— screening this year included: - Literacy (FastBridge benchmarks): fall 58.5% on track, winter 55.2%, spring 56.8% (Belcamp). Presenters said the winter dip was not unexpected during rollout of a new literacy curriculum and that spring rebound suggests growing stability in instruction. - Math (FastBridge benchmarks): fall 58.6%, winter 59.6%, spring 56.2% (Belcamp). The district said spring assessments are intentionally more rigorous and that curriculum transitions likely contributed to the spring decline.
Belcamp and director Jeremy Sorensen emphasized the district's next steps: developing clear teacher data protocols so educators know how to interpret screening results, using diagnostic follow-ups for students identified at risk, and expanding FastBridge screening to grades K—0 in the 2025'6 school year. The district also said MCA results (state accountability tests) remain embargoed until late August and that administrators will report MCA comparisons when available.
When board members asked about special education and at-risk students, presenters said each school can disaggregate screening results by classroom and building and that students flagged at risk receive additional diagnostic assessments that drive individualized plans.
Why this matters: presenting a single, research-based universal screener across grades K—0 aims to give teachers and leaders common data to target instruction, identify students who need intervention, and track changes as curriculum implementations mature.
What happens next: administrators said they will return with MCA comparisons after the state's August release and will provide professional development and data protocols aimed at translating screening data into classroom action.
