Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Zoning Regulations topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Planning Commission recommends approval of updated zoning and subdivision regulations, 9‑0
Summary
The Planning Commission voted 9‑0 to recommend that the Board of County Commissioners adopt redlined updates to Elbert County’s zoning and subdivision regulations; commissioners debated retaining historical amendment language and community‑meeting timing before approving the package as presented.
The Elbert County Planning Commission voted unanimously to recommend that the Board of County Commissioners adopt a redlined update to the county’s zoning and subdivision regulations.
Commissioners debated several specific edits during a public meeting, including removal of an Economic Development Zone (EDZ) reference, striking the concept plan requirement, how to present historical amendment dates in the regulations, and a proposed timing rule for community meetings ahead of public hearings. After discussion the commission voted 9‑0 to recommend adoption of the posted redlines as presented.
Planning staff advised commissioners that the updated package includes redlines across multiple articles and appendices and that the county attorney had reviewed the materials and did not raise legal objections to moving the changes forward. One commissioner asked whether amendment 5 had been properly enacted; staff said the new consolidated regulations would supersede previous inconsistencies and that redlines should enable faster adoption and recordation.
The package debated by the commission included removal of EDZ language, striking the concept plan from the rules, and line‑by‑line edits across multiple articles and appendices intended to modernize the county’s zoning and subdivision regulations. Commissioners discussed retaining a historical record of past amendments versus removing dated amendment language; staff agreed to follow up to provide an accurate chronology if commissioners wanted it preserved.
A motion to recommend approval — listing the redlined changes as presented to the commission — passed on a roll‑call vote: Dan Sands, Didi (Schott) Grace, John Gresham, Nicole Hunt, Kyle Denardo, Dan McCallan, Diana Edstrom, Robert Politek and Kevin Kirkwood all voted yes (9 ayes, 0 nays). The recommendation will go to the Board of County Commissioners for final action.
