Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Civil Rights Enforcement topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Pittsburgh LGBTQIA+ commission backs ordinance to deprioritize enforcement of laws that target identity
Summary
The commission voted to draft and send a statement supporting city council action to deprioritize enforcement of laws that would criminalize people based on protected identities, and scheduled a press conference for council consideration.
The City of Pittsburgh LGBTQIA+ Commission unanimously voted June 20 to draft a statement of support for an ordinance that would direct city enforcement to deprioritize laws that criminalize people based on protected identities.
Commissioners said the proposed ordinance is a defensive measure against state and federal bills they described as targeting transgender people and other protected groups. “In the event that a law that targets identity and not conduct is passed, that is deprioritized … to the furthest extent possible,” a presenter summarized during the meeting.
Why it matters: Commissioners said the ordinance would not invalidate state or federal law but would direct local enforcement resources away from prosecuting identity-based restrictions. Presenters cited prior local actions taking a similar approach in response to threats to reproductive care and gender-affirming care.
Details of the proposal: Staff from a City office and outside drafters described examples of actions they would expect the ordinance to deprioritize, including criminal penalties aimed at gender identity or expression — for instance, laws that would single out transgender people participating in athletics or seeking medical care. The presenters emphasized the text would reference the city’s protected classes list so protections would apply broadly, not only to LGBTQIA+ identities.
Commission action and next steps: Commissioners approved a motion to create a statement supporting the ordinance and were asked to attend a press conference at 9 a.m. on Tuesday, June 24, ahead of a 10 a.m. council meeting when the bills were to be introduced. Staff said they would circulate a draft statement and that the mayor’s liaison would attend in an official capacity.
Public participation and outreach: Commissioners were asked to spread the word and, if possible, attend the press conference in person. Organizers said they would provide a communications template to help solicit community support.
The commission’s vote was a voice vote recorded in the meeting as unanimous; the transcript does not list an exact roll-call tally.
