Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Zoning Map Amendment topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Planning commission continues Moose Ridge zoning map amendment after intense public comment and asks for slope analysis
Summary
The commission continued a proposed zoning map amendment for the Moose Ridge site (request to change 42 acres from SF-3 to SF-8) to allow the applicant time to analyze alternatives including SF-5 and to provide a slope map and other materials; the item will return after the applicant and staff coordinate a date-certain continuance.
The Reno Planning Commission on June 16 continued consideration of a zoning map amendment for roughly 42 acres north of Moose Ridge Drive after several residents raised safety, traffic and density concerns and commissioners requested additional slope and density analysis.
The applicant, Rubicon Design Group, sought to rezone city land from single-family residential (SF-3) — roughly three units per acre — to SF-8 (about eight units per acre) for a parcel the applicant described as approximately 42 acres, of which about 16 acres are likely developable. The applicant estimated a buildout of roughly 60–65 homes on the developable portion. Commissioners paused the proposal and unanimously agreed to continue the item so the applicant can evaluate whether SF-5 (a mid-range lot size) would meet project goals and provide clearer slope mapping that delineates areas of 30% or greater slope and potential open-space dedication.
Why it matters: The rezoning would change lot-size minimums and permitted lot widths in the area and could materially affect traffic, school access, hillside grading and trail connections for adjacent neighborhoods. Several neighbors and commissioners said they need more detailed engineering and slope information before the commission and the public can assess compatibility.
Public comment and applicant presentation Derek Wilson of Rubicon Design Group presented the request and emphasized it is a zoning map amendment only; he said the project team anticipates that only about 16 of the 42 acres are practically developable given topography and NV Energy easement constraints and that the remainder would remain open.
Multiple residents from Moose Ridge Drive and surrounding streets testified in chambers and on the record. Craig Weaver, a Northwest Reno resident, said handouts circulated by the applicant were misleading because they suggested the new development would be consistent with the existing lots on Moose Ridge Drive; Weaver said existing lots are roughly one-quarter to one-third acre with three-car garages while SF-8 would permit much smaller lots (about one-eighth of an acre) and a 0-lot-line style that is “not consistent.” Other speakers, including Ruth Angel, Alan Orcutt, Steve Diefler, Kelsey Brown and David White, raised concerns about traffic, ingress/egress at nearby intersections, safety near two schools on Robb Drive, on-street parking spillover, and the potential for increased runoff and slope instability.
Staff analysis and code context Leah Piccati, associate planner, explained that the current request is a straight zoning map amendment to change the zoning district; Piccati said the requested SF-8 zoning conforms to the master-plan land-use designation of single-family residential and is compatible with SF-8 zoning directly to the south. She also explained that state law allows dividing property into up to four parcels without subdivision procedures and that more than four parcels will trigger a tentative map, infrastructure requirements and further public hearings. Piccati noted hillside development standards and potential reductions to allowed density on steep slopes, meaning a final unit count will be refined during tentative map and site-plan review.
Commissioner questions and completion items Commissioners asked for more engineering-level information before taking action: they requested a slope map identifying areas over 30% grade, clear delineation of which acreage is expected to be developed, and a comparison showing whether SF-5 zoning could achieve the developer’s goals while preserving more open space and better matching existing nearby lot sizes. The applicant agreed to evaluate SF-5 and to supply slope and tentative-map-level information; the applicant also said they would consider dedicating unused portions as open space at the time of tentative map submittal.
Ending: continuance and next steps The commission unanimously approved a continuance to give the applicant time to supply slope mapping and comparative rezoning analysis (applicant requested a 30-day continuance). Staff and the applicant will coordinate a specific continuance date and notice the item for a future hearing; any tentative-map application that follows will include additional public hearings for traffic, drainage and hillside-grading plans.
