Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Zoning Notice Hb24 topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Planners back zoning‑code edits to match state law on voting standards, notice signs and online posting
Summary
Planning staff recommended, and the commission unanimously approved, amendments to conform Cedar Park’s zoning rules to recent state changes (House Bill 24): updated voting references, online posting, larger on‑site signs and an adjusted interval for sign placement with a fee change to cover sign costs.
The Planning & Zoning Commission unanimously recommended on July 15 that City Council adopt zoning code updates to reflect changes in state law triggered by House Bill 24 and to adjust related local procedures and fees.
Andreina Davila, development services, explained that House Bill 24 amended Texas law on voting and notice for certain zoning cases and added posting and internet requirements. "House bill 24 ... added this new section to essentially for zoning cases that result in an increase of residential units. ... that petition will need to be signed by 60% of the adjacent property owners," Davila said, and staff explained the city already requires the majority vote specified by the statute in many cases.
Davila said state changes also require online publication and a 24‑by‑48‑inch sign posted on properties subject to notice; Cedar Park’s existing code required 24‑by‑36 signs in some circumstances. To accommodate the larger signs staff proposed increasing the spacing interval between posted signs from 200 feet to 500 feet and adjusting the fee schedule to cover the larger sign production and placement.
Commissioners asked practical questions about implementation, including whether public notices in the Austin American‑Statesman are behind a paywall and whether developers could post additional signs voluntarily. Davila said the city already posts notices on its website as a matter of policy and that staff posts the required signs on properties to meet statutory posting and maintenance obligations.
Some commissioners suggested keeping the 200‑foot spacing despite the larger sign size to improve visibility for residents who rely on local outlets and community publications; others noted the change merely aligns city code with state law and city practice. Chair and commissioners urged residents and stakeholders to attend upcoming council hearings if they had concerns.
Commissioner Antel moved to recommend approval of the ordinance updates as written; Commissioner Bradford Brown seconded. The Planning & Zoning Commission voted 6‑0 to recommend the code updates to the City Council. The amendment packet will go to City Council for public hearing Aug. 14 with action and second reading slated for Aug. 28.
The proposed code update includes explicit references to the Texas Local Government Code voting standards, a new requirement that notice be posted on the city website, a required 24" x 48" on‑site notice sign standard, a proposed adjustment of sign spacing from 200 ft to 500 ft, and a fee change to cover the larger signs.
