Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Committee advances AB 1319 to give state agencies an expedited path if federal ESA protections are reduced

July 08, 2025 | California State Senate, Senate, Legislative, California


This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »

Committee advances AB 1319 to give state agencies an expedited path if federal ESA protections are reduced
The Senate Natural Resources and Water Committee advanced Assembly Bill 1319, a bill that would create a structured, expedited process for the California Fish and Game Commission and Department of Fish and Wildlife to evaluate native California species that lose federal endangered species protections and, when appropriate, make them candidates for listing under the California Endangered Species Act (CESA).

Assemblymember Schultz said the bill responds to federal proposals that could narrow the scope of federal ESA protections. The measure would require quarterly reports identifying federal changes that decrease protections for listed species; the Fish and Game Commission could then consider emergency rulemaking to make a species a candidate under state law and proceed through the state’s standard listing process.

Supporters including Defenders of Wildlife, Audubon California and the Center for Biological Diversity said AB 1319 provides an orderly way for the state to preserve protections for species if federal standards are rolled back. They argued the bill would reduce uncertainty for species, local agencies and project proponents by clarifying when and how the state would step in.

Opponents, including multiple water agencies and trade groups, expressed concerns that mandatory review and emergency listing authority would produce legal uncertainty and impose heavy workload and fiscal burdens on the Department of Fish and Wildlife, which stakeholders said is already understaffed. Opponents asked for narrower triggers — for example limiting mandatory review to an actual federal delisting rather than all federal actions that could decrease protections.

Committee members split along familiar lines over balancing conservation with permitting and infrastructure needs; the motion to advance the bill carried and the measure was left on call.

Don't Miss a Word: See the Full Meeting!

Go beyond summaries. Unlock every video, transcript, and key insight with a Founder Membership.

Get instant access to full meeting videos
Search and clip any phrase from complete transcripts
Receive AI-powered summaries & custom alerts
Enjoy lifetime, unrestricted access to government data
Access Full Meeting

30-day money-back guarantee

Sponsors

Proudly supported by sponsors who keep California articles free in 2025

Scribe from Workplace AI
Scribe from Workplace AI
Family Portal
Family Portal