Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Northgate Ridge Rezone topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Commission backs rezoning of 83-acre Northgate Ridge area to RCP despite public concern; two commissioners dissent
Summary
The commission recommended changing the future land use designation and rezoning about 83 acres in the Northgate area from Commercial General to Residential Commercial Professional (RCP). Several residents warned the change could reduce future purely commercial zoning and asked for more impact analysis; the motion passed with two 'no' votes.
The Planning and Zoning Commission voted July 9 to recommend a future land use map amendment and rezoning of approximately 83 acres east of Olympus Drive and Northgate Parkway from Commercial General (CG) to Residential Commercial Professional (RCP) and from a commercial future land use designation to mixed-use.
Chris Adams of Creek Hollow Associates, representing owner Buck Swaney and SmartTown LLC, told the commission the RCP zone better fits the developer's intended mix of single-family, townhomes, professional offices and neighborhood commercial. Planning Director Bridal McClain (staff) said much of the area immediately west of Olympus Drive is already zoned RCP and that the proposed map amendment would extend a mixed-use designation consistent with the comprehensive plan and the city's vision for a walkable neighborhood.
A resident, Heather Dislequin (635 Gary Street), was the principal public commenter and asked for more analysis on long-term economic impacts, traffic, fire and emergency-service impacts, and how the area's status as an urban renewal/TIF district affects fiscal capacity. Dislequin told commissioners: "This application undermines ... real economic development opportunities and ignores the issues which frequently accompany higher density development," and specifically asked for traffic and service studies.
City staff responded that required traffic and development impact studies are performed at the development stage (preliminary plat and engineering review) rather than during a high-level rezoning; staff said those studies would be required when a preliminary plat is submitted and that zoning approval does not relieve a project of later technical requirements.
Commissioner Gomez moved to recommend approval and Commissioner Valadolid seconded. The motion passed with two recorded "no" votes. The recommendation now goes to City Council for final action; staff and the applicant said a revised preliminary plat will follow to address layout and density details.
