Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Noxious Weeds topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
County staff: enforcement workload left some noxious‑weed cases unresolved; abatement can lead to large bills and liens
Summary
A county staff member told commissioners that staff capacity has been strained and some property owners may face abatement bills of roughly $3,500–$4,200, with the county able to place liens if bills go unpaid; two of three recent notices have come into compliance.
Get email alerts on the Noxious Weeds topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
A county staff member reported to the Morrow County Board of Commissioners on July 2 that enforcement of noxious‑weed complaints has been stretched thin and that some landowners could face expensive abatement bills and liens if the county must complete work ordered in notices.
The speaker described the typical enforcement process: staff first try to work with property owners informally, then send a written 20‑day notice requiring remediation; if owners do not comply zoning/planning enforcement can escalate, and ultimately the county can abate and bill the owner. The speaker said the bill for county abatement can run roughly $3,500–$4,200 and that unpaid bills may become liens on the property.
"It's gonna be 3,500 to $4,200 if the county steps in and takes care of it," the speaker said, urging commissioners to note the consequences for landowners who fall behind on weed control and for neighbors who may see noxious weeds spread.
The speaker said the department has recently sent three written 20‑day notices; two properties came into compliance and one was in progress (sprayer tracks were observed). Staff attributed part of the enforcement delay to limited personnel, noting the workload has increased over several years and the department is seeking to hire staff to address the backlog.
Commissioners and staff discussed the need for a more complete compliance loop, including follow‑up plans from the weed district or extension to help landowners with sustained control rather than a single order to "get rid of" the plants, the speaker said.
Ending: Staff asked commissioners to relay the explanation to constituents and signaled recruitment is under way to restore capacity for timely code enforcement and weed‑management planning.

