Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Ethics Conflict Of Interest topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
County counselor reviews conflict-of-interest rules for commissioners and planning board
Summary
The county counselor summarized the Kansas Conflict of Interest Act thresholds, common-law standards and planning-and-zoning bylaws, advising commissioners to disclose substantial interests and abstain from actions where conflicts exist.
Seward County’s county counselor briefed commissioners on conflict-of-interest standards that apply to both the county commission and the planning and zoning board, summarizing statutory thresholds and local bylaw provisions and urging caution when a potential conflict exists.
The counselor said the Kansas Conflict of Interest Act defines a ‘‘substantial interest’’ in business terms and sets quantitative thresholds: ownership exceeding $5,000 or 5 percent of a business; aggregate compensation from a business exceeding $2,000 in the preceding calendar year; or receipt of gifts exceeding $500. Spouses’ interests are included. The counselor said a commissioner or planning board member with a substantial interest must disclose it in writing to the county election official (the county clerk) and must abstain from participating in contracts or actions affecting that business interest.
The counselor also summarized common-law duties: public officials owe an undivided duty of loyalty to the county, and taking a private interest adverse to the public without full disclosure can be treated as a breach of trust under case law. The planning and zoning board’s bylaws include broader language requiring members to refrain from recommending or acting on matters that would benefit individuals or special-interest groups rather than the county as a whole; the counselor said planning board members should consult their bylaws and individual lease documents where relevant.
A commissioner asked how the rules apply to licensed real-estate activity; the counselor said the analysis is fact-specific and offered to review individual circumstances if members request an opinion. The counselor said when in doubt, officials should exercise caution and consider recusal.
The counselor said he will provide additional information on an advisory-vote question the commission previously raised and will share the guidance with the planning and zoning board.
