Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Land Use topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Hurricane planning commission approves conditional use for metal shop, asks staff to draft code change
Summary
The Planning Commission approved a conditional use permit for a metal shop and requested staff draft language to remove routine metal buildings from commission review or allow administrative approval, while commissioners raised appearance and appeal concerns.
Get email alerts on the Land Use topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Hurricane Planning Commission on an unstated date approved a conditional use permit for a metal shop and directed staff to draft code language that would reduce future planning-commission review of metal buildings.
Commissioners approved the application "subject to staff and JUC comments," moving the project forward after brief discussion of whether the commission should continue to hear similar applications. The applicant proposed to use the new shop partially for storage and asked only for power to be run to the building.
Commission members and staff framed the issue as a broader land‑use process question: whether metal buildings should remain a conditional use requiring Planning Commission review, be approved administratively by the planning director, or be allowed by right under the building permit process if they meet the building code. Dayton (staff member) described two options: allow metal buildings by right through a building permit, or keep them as conditional uses but delegate review to the planning director to approve administratively.
Several commissioners expressed support for administrative review. One commissioner said the building‑permit review could address aesthetic concerns — for example, limiting reflective materials or requiring an approved color palette — and that staff already maintains a list of acceptable metal colors. Another commissioner urged applicants to make metal buildings “blend in to the neighborhood,” noting appearance is often the source of opposition: "Prejudice against metal buildings is appearance. And so if you can make it blend in, I think you'll..." (Commissioner, as identified in the transcript).
Commissioner comments also noted procedural protections would remain: the planning director could refer complex applications to the commission, and decisions could be appealed under existing code. Fred (staff member) agreed to draft ordinance language to move routine approvals out of the commission's regular agenda.
The commission then voted to approve the conditional use permit and asked Fred to prepare draft code amendments for review. The motion was made and seconded; members present voted "Aye." The approval was conditioned to incorporate staff and JUC comments.
The commission and staff emphasized that even if the commission changes the review pathway, building permits and inspections still apply. The planning director or staff would retain authority to deny or escalate proposals that raise unusual technical or neighborhood‑compatibility issues.
Looking ahead, staff said they would bring proposed ordinance language to the commission and then to the City Council as an ordinance update if commissioners agree.
Ending: The commission approved the permit and requested the planning staff draft code language clarifying whether metal buildings are permitted administratively or by right; no effective code change was adopted at this meeting, and any ordinance update would require City Council action.
