Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Telecoms Permitting topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Resident tells council Verizon tower was installed without required local review; asks city to declare structure nonconforming
Summary
A nearby homeowner said a new Verizon antenna structure bypassed local review and asked the city to declare it nonconforming, require a new application and enforce retrospective compliance with local ordinances and historic review requirements.
Get email alerts on the Telecoms Permitting topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Ben Adams told the Lake Oswego City Council on July 15 that a Verizon telecommunications structure adjacent to his family’s listed historic home was installed as a new tower without required local conditional‑use review and public notice.
Adams said Ordinance 21-44 requires a conditional‑use process for new towers and that, in his view, the structure was not a simple collocation on an existing tower but a new build that should have required zoning review and a Section 106 historic review. He said the city’s planning department did not follow the conditional‑use procedure at the time, that a stop‑work order issued in May found the project did not qualify for federal streamlining, and that the stop‑work order was later lifted based on a federal definition Adams disputes.
Adams asked the city to declare the structure nonconforming under the zoning code, require Verizon to file a new application and process it as a new facility with public notice, and enforce retroactive compliance including a conditional‑use permit and full zoning review. He said inconsistent enforcement and the installation’s proximity to his listed historic property had harmed his property value.
City response: Councilors thanked Adams for bringing the concern to public comment. No council action or formal referral was recorded in the meeting minutes; the remarks were received during the public‑comment period.
Ending: Adams concluded by asking the city to reopen and review the project because he believes the 1997 permits did not authorize the current structure.

