Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Reproductive Health topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Senate committee advances bill to shield medication-abortion providers and patients (AB 54)
Summary
The Senate committee advanced Assembly Bill 54, which would bar civil or criminal penalties for distributing, transporting, manufacturing or using medication-abortion drugs such as mifepristone and misoprostol, sponsors said. Supporters said the measure protects access amid national threats; opponents warned of safety and reporting concerns.
Assemblymember Krau presented Assembly Bill 54 to the California Senate Committee on Health, asking members to advance the measure that would enshrine in state law that distributing, transporting, manufacturing or using medication-abortion drugs is legal and protected from civil and criminal penalties.
Supporters told the committee the bill clarifies state protections for mifepristone and misoprostol and shields people and entities who provide or facilitate medication abortion. Tiffany Brokaw of the California Department of Justice, representing Attorney General Rob Bonta, said, “AB 54 would ensure continued access to medication abortion by enshrining in California law that it is legal to transport and deliver this medication throughout the state.” Angela Pontes, senior vice president for government affairs at Planned Parenthood Affiliates of California, said AB 54 “reassures Californians that their right to essential health care is and will remain protected.”
Opponents argued the bill goes too far in shielding providers and manufacturers and raised safety and reporting concerns. Greg Burr of the California Family Council urged the committee to reject AB 54, saying the measure “will shield the abortion industry that places politics above women's health” and cited studies he said show higher complication rates.
Committee members noted the bill responds to national legal threats after the overturning of Roe v. Wade and that California has a state constitutional amendment protecting the right to choose (referenced in testimony as a state constitutional amendment). The author accepted technical amendments offered by committee staff and asked for an aye vote when quorum was present.
Action and next steps: The committee moved AB 54 as amended and referred it to the Committee on Judiciary. The roll calls recorded during the hearing were conducted in multiple stages; the transcript records the committee moving the bill and later reports the bill as out of committee with a vote count of 9 yes, 2 no and 1 absent. Specific member votes were recorded during roll calls in the transcript but not consistently attached to a single consolidated roll; the tally above follows the final count announced in committee.
Ending: The committee advanced AB 54 to the Judiciary Committee for further consideration, with supporters saying the bill protects access and opponents continuing to voice safety concerns.
