Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Annexation topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Town staff presents voluntary annexation at Oak Ridge Farm Highway; commissioners raise traffic and impervious-cover concerns

AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Planning staff presented a voluntary annexation request for 4.697 acres at 754 Oak Ridge Farm Highway to enable connection to town utilities for a small retail project. Commissioners expressed concern about a nearby intersection and the site’s 12% impervious limit.

Town planning staff presented a voluntary annexation request for a 4.697-acre property at 754 Oak Ridge Farm Highway and told the Board of Commissioners the owners intend to use public utilities for a small retail development.

Veronica Bateson, planner II, said the property lies in Mooresville’s extraterritorial jurisdiction and, if annexed, would be in Ward 2. She said the site is in tier 1 of the town’s growth map and that water and sewer are available with no capacity issues. The owners were identified as All About U Holdings LLC and the applicant as Mylan 2, Bateson said.

Bateson said the parcel is currently zoned Hybrid Light Industrial and that the applicant told staff they intend a small retail establishment (staff mentioned a nail salon as an example). She said the site is constrained by town sewer easements, a stream buffer, NCDOT right-of-way, and the Back Creek watershed, leaving a 12% impervious coverage limit under town policy. At that coverage limit the developable impervious area is small, Bateson said.

Commissioners said the intersection at Overhill Drive and Selma Highway is a local concern and asked whether NCDOT had weighed in on driveway location and right-of-way requirements; staff said they had not yet received DOT input and would obtain that information. Some commissioners urged the applicant to pursue conditional zoning rather than a by-right annexation so the board could consider limits on allowed uses because the 12% impervious cap will effectively constrain many uses.

Staff said the site meets statutory requirements for voluntary annexation; the board did not take a final vote during the briefing.