Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Committee Procedures Suspense topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Appropriations committee moves remaining bills to suspense file; AB 377 moved to Senate floor under Rule 28.8
Summary
After the AB 1138 hearing, the Senate Appropriations Committee moved 14 remaining measures to the suspense file without objection. AB 377 was not heard because it was sent directly to the floor under Senate Rule 28.8. Most measures had authors waive presentation; only a few witnesses offered support or opposition during the hearing.
Get email alerts on the Committee Procedures Suspense topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Senate Committee on Appropriations moved the bulk of its remaining agenda to the committee’s suspense file without objection. Committee members repeatedly noted authors had waived presentation and that public testimony would be taken when called; in most cases no public testimony was offered.
Procedural exception: AB 377 by Assemblymember Tang (listed in the daily file) was not heard because it was sent directly to the Senate floor under Senate Rule 28.8, as announced at the start of the hearing.
Measures moved to suspense: The committee moved the following measures to the suspense file without objection: AB 55 (Assemblymember Bonta); AB 1296 (Assemblymember Bonta); AB 251 (Assemblymember Cholera); AB 266 (Assemblymember Davis/Davies); AB 378 (Assemblymember Valencia); AB 393 (Assemblymember Connolly); AB 413 (Assemblymember Fong); AB 562 (Assemblymember Salacci); AB 1390 (Assemblymember Salacci); AB 896 (Assemblymember Elohari); AB 1178 (Assemblymember Pacheco); AB 1181 (Assemblymember Haney); AB 1220 (Assemblymember Arambula); and AB 1293 (Assemblymember Wallace). Committee staff and the chair recorded no objections and no committee questions for those items; several witnesses briefly noted support or opposition where present.
Testimony on specific suspense items: Roxy Ortiz (Association of Regional Center Agencies) testified in support of AB 251 (as noted in the record). Danielle Persons (California Assisted Living Association) registered opposition to AB 251. For other suspense items, witness presence was sparse and no committee questions were recorded.
Next steps: Items on the suspense file may be recalled by the committee chair or considered later in the fiscal process. The committee adjourned after concluding the hearing.
