Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Accessory Structures Yard Rules topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Committee continues ordinance to simplify rules for accessory yard structures after questions about sleeping quarters and process
Summary
An ordinance that would permit certain accessory structures in required yards, exempt small accessory structures from building permits and allow relocation/repair of nonconforming yard structures was continued so staff and the sponsor can refine language on sleeping quarters, relocation and other technical points.
The Land Use and Transportation Committee continued an ordinance that would provide standards for repair and relocation of existing noncomplying structures in required yards, allow certain accessory structures up to 10 feet tall or 120 square feet within required yards, and exempt accessory structures up to 120 square feet from building permits.
Sponsor Supervisor Joel Engardio said the ordinance was drafted to reduce confusion and delay for homeowners and building owners who confront complex planning and building-code requirements when repairing or replacing long-standing yard structures. He described instances in which honest home-improvement projects have triggered lengthy approval processes and potential fines.
Planning staff described proposed technical amendments requested by staff: clarifying that detached yard structures may not contain sleeping quarters, allowing relocated noncomplying structures to retain original setback distance, permitting installation of new fire-rated walls without a variance when adjacent to property lines, and removing a variance-application refund provision. Audrey Marloney of the Planning Department explained that "sleeping quarters" is used to provide an enforcement mechanism so structures are not used as dwelling units.
Public comment urged continued review and more time for stakeholders; Eileen Bogan of the Coalition for San Francisco Neighborhoods asked that the item be continued and noted technical drafting issues. Chair Mirna Melgar moved to continue the item to the call of the chair; the committee voted 3-0 to continue.
