Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Public Participation Policy topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Board delays meeting-conduct changes after public pushback; complaint policy approved for first reading

5091819 · June 25, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Board members declined to adopt a proposed meeting-conduct policy in first reading after audience members and some trustees raised concerns about limiting public comment to one hour. The board did approve a separate policy on complaints concerning board members on first reading.

The Ketchikan Gateway Borough School District Board of Education on June 25 rejected a proposed revision to its meeting-conduct policy — which would have tightened rules on public participation and set firm time limits — after public comments and trustee concerns. At the same meeting the board approved a new policy establishing a process for public complaints against board members in first reading.

The proposed meeting-conduct policy would have formalized a five-minute speaker limit and an overall one-hour cap on public comment, added language on prohibited disruptive demonstrations, and set conduct expectations for trustees during public comment. The board president said the draft drew from Alaska School Boards (ASB) guidance and similar policies in other districts and was intended to restore decorum after meetings that became contentious.

Several members of the public spoke during citizen remarks. Laura Jackson told trustees she opposed limiting public comment and urged the board to remain available: “If you’re going to limit people and their time to speak… that is a disservice to the community.” Another commenter, Hunter Reminski, told the board that borough property taxpayers have “skin in the game” and said limiting public comment in the summer when attendance is lower would be “wrong.” Sheila Klosterman urged the board to “put the students and their families first in all your decision making.”

Board members said they supported revisions in principle but wanted more public input and legal review of specific wording. On a roll-call vote the board recorded zero votes in favor of the meeting-conduct policy in first reading (0–7). The president said the draft will return to the policy committee for further edits and to incorporate public suggestions.

Separately the board approved on first reading a policy (BP 1312.5) establishing a formal process for members of the public to submit complaints concerning individual board members, and spelling out how those complaints would be placed on an agenda and the timeline for board response. That motion passed on roll call 7–0.

Board members and staff said changes and clarifying language will be considered by the policy committee and reintroduced at a future meeting. The president encouraged public input and noted the board could extend public-comment time by vote in any meeting.