Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Public Art Murals topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Gardiner HPC OKs rear-wall mural at 343 Water Street, excludes QR code

5073419 · June 17, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The Gardiner Historic Preservation Commission granted a certificate of appropriateness for a permanent mural on the rear wall of 343 Water Street, approving the artist's sturgeon-and-salmon design but explicitly excluding a QR code for donations; the project will go before Gardiner City Council next.

The Gardiner Historic Preservation Commission voted to grant a certificate of appropriateness for a permanent painted mural on the rear wall of 343 Water Street, a block that borders Bridge Street and Water Street, but the approval explicitly excludes any QR code for soliciting donations.

The decision matters because the mural — proposed by applicant and artist Meg Umiggy — is intended to depict sturgeon, salmon and river imagery tied to the Kennebec River and to draw visitors to downtown Gardiner. Commissioners and members of the public discussed preservation, public-safety concerns, the visual relationship to the nearby A1 Diner and the limits of the commission's authority; the commission noted the City Council must also consider the project at its next meeting, described in the transcript as taking place "tomorrow night" at 6 p.m.

"The theme would be sturgeon and salmon and fishing a little bit," applicant Meg Umiggy told the commission, saying the mural is intended to remind people that fish once ran in the Kennebec and to encourage interest in river projects such as fish ladders. Umiggy said she plans to pay for repairs and the mural work and described plans to paint the wall a neutral background color before adding the artwork.

Commission members and attendees pressed for details about the work and the wall: the mural will occupy the rear exterior of the three-story block at the stated address, with the painted surface extending up to the first row of windows and the stone foundation left unpainted below the sills. Umiggy told the panel she intends to use oil-based paint and that concrete paint with an expected 20-to-30-year life has been used in preparation. She said some masonry and window repairs are already planned and that fragile mortar on the stone foundation will not be painted over.

Code enforcement and staff raised questions about signage rules and donations. Chris McNeil, code enforcement, told the commission that the city's sign ordinance constrains commercial uses and said: "the ordinance actually, does not allow anything in the commercial realm with a mural, and I think asking for donations... incorporated in the mural, I think that's probably gonna be a no go." The commission agreed to exclude a QR code linked to donations from its certificate: "Oh, this this approval does not include the creation of a QR code at this time. We agree that the project is consistent with the Secretary of Interior's standards for treatment of historic properties," said Robert Abby during the motion discussion.

Jerry Doyle, chair of the commission, told the room the panel's remit is to judge the concept and compatibility with the historic district rather than detailed color choices: "HPC generally doesn't concern themselves with color... it's more the concept that we're concerned with here." The commission also cited consistency with the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for the Treatment of Historic Properties when discussing allowable treatments.

Public comment was mixed. Several residents praised the proposal as a way to improve the visual approach to downtown and to celebrate local river ecology; others — including some who identified the adjacent A1 Diner as a town landmark — worried the mural might distract motorists at a busy intersection. One commissioner and several speakers suggested alternatives such as window signs or a small donation box at sidewalk level if fundraising is desired without placing a QR code on the mural.

On procedural points, the commission noted that another municipal body — the Gardiner City Council — must also review and act on the application. The transcript records the commission asking that the applicant be prepared to present a final or near-final rendering to Council. Several commissioners asked the applicant to show exact placement and proportions of animals and other elements when the City Council hears the matter.

The commission moved to approve the certificate of appropriateness for the proposed painted mural on the rear of the block at city tax map 30037, Lot 108. The formal motion text recorded in the meeting was: "The Gardiner Historic Preservation Commission grants a certificate of appropriateness for the proposed project to create a painted mural on the rear side of that block, which borders Bridge Street and Water Street." The approval explicitly did not include a QR code. The transcript does not record a named mover, a named seconder, or a roll-call vote tally.

The project record, including the applicant's mural sketches and the commission's certificate, will be available with the commission's application materials; the commission directed that City Council receive the certificate and the application for its consideration at the council meeting mentioned in the transcript.