Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Education Technology topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Mesa board approves limited Course Mojo AI pilot after public debate over privacy, bias
Summary
The Mesa Unified School District Governing Board voted 3–2 to accept a memorandum of understanding that brings 1,300 free Course Mojo licenses for a limited pilot at two campuses after months of questions from parents and public commenters about data sharing, ideological bias and classroom use.
The Mesa Unified School District Governing Board on July 22 approved a memorandum of understanding (MOU) with Course Mojo that allows the district to try up to 1,300 free licenses at two middle-school campuses as a limited pilot.
The pilot will be limited in scope and sites, the superintendent said, and district staff will monitor usage, collect feedback and report back with results. The board approved the MOU by a 3–2 vote after a public comment period in which parents and community members pressed the board to explain how the tool works and how student data would be handled.
The board and district staff said Course Mojo will use curriculum the district has already approved rather than generating new content. “What is feeding the AI is curriculum that we’ve already approved, like a textbook,” Superintendent Matthew Strom said during the board discussion. He and staff also said the district published a frequently asked questions document after the item was tabled at a previous meeting to clarify data and privacy issues.
Public commentators who opposed adoption called for greater transparency. Daniel Woods, a resident who said he builds commercial AI products, asked the district to release the system’s prompt — the instructions that shape how the tool responds — before the board votes. “We don’t know what the prompt is for Course Mojo,” he said during the call to the public. Another commenter, Kerry Davis, cited research about handwriting and memory and said she opposed the district adopting Course Mojo because of those academic concerns.
Board members who voted to approve the MOU said they did so because the pilot is limited, the vendor supplied free licenses, parents can opt out, and the district will gather implementation and outcome data. Opponents said the pilot still risks introducing vendor prompts or biases into instruction and urged a smaller test or more classroom observation before approval.
Under the approved MOU, the initial pilot will be offered at two campuses (Rhodes and Smith), focusing on targeted grade levels and monitored by site administrators and curriculum staff. Staff said the district will collect data on usage, engagement and whether the tool is associated with measurable learning gains before any wider rollout.
Board members also clarified that the MOU covers only licenses and does not commit the district to paid purchases beyond the pilot. Parents and others will be able to observe classrooms by coordinating with site administrators, staff said. The district plans to report pilot data and community feedback to the board at a future meeting.
Votes at a glance: the MOU to accept up to 1,300 free Course Mojo licenses was approved 3–2; the two dissenting members said concerns about data, neutrality and premature rollout had not been fully resolved.
Next steps: the district will implement the pilot at the two sites, gather usage and outcome data, and return to the Governing Board with an evaluation and recommendations before any expansion.
