Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Land Use Fences topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Council continues debate on front-yard fence rules, directs staff to draft zoning amendment
Summary
Decatur council discussed options for front-yard fences including prohibitions, standards (materials, 50% visibility, 36-inch height), variances and historic-district exceptions; staff will draft ordinance language for Planning & Zoning and return for first reading on Aug. 14
The Decatur City Council continued a discussion about proposed changes to the city’s fence ordinance, focusing on whether to allow front-yard fences, which materials should be prohibited, appropriate height and visibility standards, and how to treat historic-district properties.
City planner Wayne briefed the council on the existing ordinance language that currently allows six-foot front-yard fences under narrow circumstances (lots with multiple street frontages or unplatted side yards) with a 10-foot setback from the street or five-foot setback from the sidewalk. Wayne presented three broad options: prohibit front-yard fences; allow them in limited circumstances (including by variance to the board of adjustment); or adopt specific regulations by zoning or overlay district.
Councilmembers discussed resident requests for front-yard fences (staff noted roughly five calls in the previous two weeks plus earlier inquiries), and raised practical and aesthetic questions. Councilmembers expressed support for clear, objective standards to help staff administer the rule rather than ad hoc judgments. A number of councilmembers favored allowing limited front-yard fencing with standards such as a maximum height of 36 inches, a 50% visibility requirement between pickets or posts, and bans on chain-link, hog panels and certain wire fences—while preserving the ability to allow decorative historic wire fencing in the downtown overlay. Wayne said staff would draft language to allow historically appropriate decorative wire fences while retaining prohibitions on non-historic wire and chain-link in front yards.
Council agreed that fence maintenance standards (paint/stain/seal for wooden fences) and screening/buffering provisions should be included. The planner said the amendment will be processed as a zoning change: it must go to the Planning and Zoning Commission for recommendation (targeted for the Aug. 4 P&Z meeting) and then return to council for first reading on Aug. 14.
On next steps Wayne said staff would draft ordinance language reflecting council direction, including criteria for allowed materials, setbacks and the 36-inch front-yard height standard, and return with proposed text after research into historic-district precedent.
Quotes (selected): "Whenever you continually receive that input from citizens that they want this and the ordinance restricts it, it's time to explore your ordinances," Wayne, city planner, said. "I think 36 inches is a good place," one councilmember said during discussion of front-yard height standards.
The council did not take a final vote but gave staff direction to draft a zoning amendment with objective standards and to bring the draft to Planning and Zoning and then back to council.
