Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Consent Calendar topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

PLUM committee approves consent items including historic-resource listings

AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The Planning and Land Use Management Committee approved consent calendar items 1–5 and 9, including several historical-cultural monument nominations and findings under CEQA, by a 4-0 roll call.

The Los Angeles City Planning and Land Use Management (PLUM) Committee approved the consent calendar items listed as 1 through 5 and item 9, taking a single roll-call vote and carrying the package.

The consent items included: adoption of findings and the previously adopted mitigated negative declaration (ENV-2023-1255-MND) for a North Campus rezoning; additions to the City's list of Historical-Cultural Monuments, including the Southern California Telephone Company exchange at 650–668 S. La Brea Avenue, the Hollywood Premier Hotel at 5329–5337 W. Hollywood Blvd (and 1716–1718 N. Serrano Ave), and the Sam Sharp triplex at 1977 N. Kenmore Ave; and adoption of recommendations described in the Planning Department communications dated June 12, 2025 and June 5, 2025 as attached to the council file.

Planning staff noted that the Commission had previously adopted environmental findings and recommended no further environmental review was required for the listed projects under CEQA guidelines, and the committee proceeded without public comment after no speakers came forward on the consent items. The roll call recorded Councilmember Blumenfield, Councilmember Hutt, Councilmember Lee and Councilmember Raman voting aye; Councilmember Nasserian was absent.

Votes at a glance - Items 1–5 and 9: Approved on consent; roll-call vote — Blumenfield: aye; Hutt: aye; Nasserian: absent; Lee: aye; Raman: yes.

Additional details, project numbers and supporting documents are posted to the council file and were read into the record during the consent presentation.