Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Transit Oriented Communities topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Milpitas council tables decision on $400,000 MTC transit‑oriented communities grant after debate
Summary
Council members debated accepting a $400,000 Metropolitan Transportation Commission grant to study increased commercial floor‑area ratios and transportation demand management for Milpitas’ TOC areas, then voted to table the item for more information.
The Milpitas City Council on June 17 tabled action on accepting a $400,000 Metropolitan Transportation Commission (MTC) Transit‑Oriented Communities (TOC) planning and implementation grant after extended public comment and council discussion about scope, regional precedent and local control.
City staff explained the grant would fund two work streams: (1) study and propose an increase to the allowable maximum floor‑area ratio (FAR) for commercial/office development in the BART Station TOC area only, and (2) study parking policies and develop transportation demand management (TDM) strategies for Milpitas’s three TOC areas (BART, Great Mall and Alder/Stadium area). Staff emphasized the city is not proposing changes to residential density or committing to MTC housing policies as part of this scope; council retains land‑use authority over actual adoption of any resulting policy changes.
During public comment Anilba Barr of the California Apartment Association urged caution, arguing TOC requirements and MTC’s implementation remain vague and that several other Bay Area cities have paused similar actions pending clarity. City staff said MTC confirmed in follow‑up correspondence that (a) accepting the grant funds would not require the city to adopt any deliverables, (b) grant funding would pay for the work and is not contingent on adopting any policy changes, and (c) the city would remain the project manager and could direct consultant deliverables.
Councilmember Chua moved to deny the staff recommendation; the motion failed. Council then voted to table the item for further review and to gather additional comparative information from other Bay Area cities. The final procedural vote to table passed 5‑0 (Barbadillo — aye; Chua — aye; Lam — aye; Lian — aye; Mayor Montano — aye). Staff said there is no immediate deadline from MTC to accept the grant and that MTC has indicated the work simply funds planning the city opts to undertake.
City staff also noted they would bring back a revised resolution clarifying local control and the limited scope of work. Council direction: return with additional comparative examples and responses to outstanding questions about applicability and potential future commitments.
