Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Impact Fees topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Meridian hears county plan for countywide impact fees; legal uncertainty remains over coroner fee
Summary
Ada County and city attorneys discussed a countywide development-impact-fee proposal that would include jail, EMS and coroner elements. City attorneys warned the coroner fee is legally uncertain under Idaho law; county officials said they would seek an attorney general opinion and continue the intergovernmental process.
Meridian city and Ada County officials discussed June 17 a proposed joint approach to countywide development impact fees for jail, EMS and coroner services. City legal staff said the county’s proposed fee for coroner services is legally uncertain under Idaho’s Impact Fee Act and recommended additional legal review before the city commits to implementation.
Kurt Stein, Meridian’s city attorney, briefed the council on the legal limits of Idaho’s development-impact-fee statute, noting the statute allows fees for certain “public facilities” and lists categories such as water, sewer and “public safety facilities, including law enforcement, fire stations and apparatus, emergency medical and rescue, and street lighting.” He said the county argues coroner services fall within law enforcement-related public-safety facilities, but Stein warned that interpretation has not been litigated and carries legal risk. "There is no bright line rule… there's lots of gray area and room for argument here," Stein said.
Stein summarized the county’s legal rationale: Idaho statutes (Title 19, Chapter 43 and Title 31, Chapter 43) give coroners authority to investigate deaths, summon jurors for inquests, issue subpoenas and in some circumstances step into law-enforcement roles when a sheriff has a conflict — powers the county argues overlap with law enforcement functions.
Ada County representative Leon Lettson told the council the county is open to obtaining an opinion from the Idaho Attorney General and that some jurisdictions (Eagle and Star) have already added the coroner CIP into their comprehensive plans. "We're happy to pursue that (an AG advice letter)," Lettson said, and added the county would remove the coroner element if a legal opinion found it outside the Impact Fee Act.
Council members expressed concern about committing to a coroner fee without external legal clarity. Councilwoman Strader urged the county to pursue an AG opinion or a declaratory judgment action in district court prior to any city ordinance that would implement collection, saying the council did not want to lead partner jurisdictions toward a fee that might later be struck down.
Why it matters: Implementation of countywide impact fees requires coordination among all incorporated municipalities in Ada County. If a coroner fee were adopted and later ruled unlawful, the city could become involved in litigation and potentially face financial liability even if contractual indemnities exist; Stein said indemnity clauses have limits under the Idaho Constitution.
Next steps: City staff suggested three options: (1) approve the intergovernmental agreements as written (the agreements mainly commit cities to consider county CIPs and use the county’s advisory committee); (2) ask staff to modify the county agreement to remove the coroner CIP before approving; or (3) delay action until the county obtains an AG opinion or other legal clarity. Several council members said they support moving the process forward while asking the county to pursue an AG opinion; staff will return the agreement for council consideration on a future consent agenda.
