Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Roads Infrastructure topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Road and Bridge leaders urge purchase of reclaimer, crack‑seal equipment and new training sessions
Summary
Superintendent Mark and staff outlined capital needs — a 4‑ton reclaimer (~$80,000), a crack‑seal trailer (~$30,000), and expanded training — and highlighted heavy maintenance needs on Blue Bell and Second Street.
Seward County Road & Bridge staff presented commissioners with a range of capital purchases and program proposals aimed at reducing recurring pavement failures and improving in‑house repair capacity.
Superintendent Mark described two priority purchases: a four‑ton reclaimer (quoted in the meeting at about $80,000) to process asphalt millings for longer‑lasting repairs, and a crack‑seal trailer plus accessories that staff estimated could cost roughly $30,000–$60,000 depending on configuration. Staff said a crack‑seal crew of about four people can reliably seal up to a mile of roadway in a day under ideal conditions, but that staffing and weather constrain productivity; contracting out crack sealing for major corridors such as Blue Bell could cost $10,000–$20,000 per mile. For Blue Bell and Second Street the county estimated about $600,000 for crack‑seal and chip‑seal needs to keep the roads in preventive maintenance condition.
Road & Bridge also reported on training: several hands‑on LTAP (Local Technical Assistance Program) modules require a minimum of 15 participants and charge about $65 per trainee; hosting multiple sessions and coordinating with neighboring counties could reduce per‑department cost. Staff proposed increasing training authority to cover courses for operators on culvert repair, gravel roads and the CAT machine training (one item noted as 9 hours in the field plus classroom time).
Other capital and program points included continuing a $500,000 road‑material reserve to enable additional local paving or road O&P projects, accounting fixes to show revenue from passport and copy fees in the correct fund, and plans to use millings produced locally to reduce external material purchases. Commissioners asked staff to refine costs by item, to produce a prioritized CIP list and to return with grant and shared‑service options for training and equipment that might reduce the county's upfront costs.
The board did not take a formal vote on purchases at this session; staff were directed to return with firm quotes, staffing plans and options that weigh buying equipment versus occasional contracting.
