Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Wireless Infrastructure topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Council approves stealth 'monopine' for proposed Crown Castle wireless site at 401 First Street

3864395 ยท June 17, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

After a public hearing and renderings showing alternatives, Gilroy City Council voted 7-0 to approve a stealth monopine design for a proposed replacement wireless facility at 401 First Street, allowing a condition that the applicant may revert to a monopole if geotechnical work shows the monopine infeasible.

Gilroy City Council on June 16 approved the replacement of an existing 35-foot monopole at 401 First Street with a stealth design modeled on a pine tree โ€” a 70-foot "monopine" โ€” instead of the taller plain monopole that the applicant originally proposed.

The decision followed a continued public hearing and a staff presentation that recapped the March planning commission proceedings. The planning commission had deadlocked 3-3 on the applications (Architectural & Site Review AS24-14 and Variance V24-01) and thus recorded a denial by lack of majority. The applicant appealed that result to council. Staff recommended the council grant the appeal and approve the applications, noting required findings could be made and that the project complied with federal FCC radio-frequency rules and state environmental exemptions cited by staff.

At the June meeting the council examined photo renderings of four options: monopole and monopine designs, each shown at one-carrier and three-carrier configurations. Counsel and staff discussed city zoning code provisions (Gilroy City Code sections 30.35.0.17(l) and 30.35.0.19(b)(8)) that permit required "stealth" designs only where specific sensitivity findings can be made, such as proximity to historic or aesthetically significant structures, residential uses, views or community features. Staff said the code's "particular sensitivity" findings could not be made in every case and that, as drafted, staff could not make those findings for the monopine automatically.

Several councilmembers described the proposed monopine as less visually intrusive given nearby residential views, parks and the cemetery and said they would prefer the stealth design for those community reasons. The applicant (Crown Castle) stated it would accept the monopine approval only if the council made the particular-sensitivity findings but asked for language allowing a fallback to the original monopole design if a required geophysical or structural study later found the monopine technically infeasible.

Council voted 7-0 to approve the monopine design. The approval includes the council's direction that the applicant may return to the monopole design if the required geotechnical or structural analysis demonstrates the monopine is infeasible; staff will verify feasibility if that step occurs.

Why it matters: The decision permits a new, higher wireless facility in downtown Gilroy while prioritizing a camouflage design to reduce visual impacts for nearby residents and community views. The council's action balances wireless infrastructure needs with local design sensitivity and requires technical verification before any fallback to a standard monopole.

Key procedural and legal points

- Project: Replacement of an existing 35-foot monopole with a 65-foot monopole or a 70-foot monopine and associated equipment at 401 First Street (AS24-14, V24-01). - Environmental review: Planning staff and the planning commission previously concluded the project is categorically exempt under CEQA class 3 (small facilities) subject to review. - Code sections cited: Gilroy City Code 30.35.0.17(l) (stealth-design requirement for certain residential/planned-unit contexts) and 30.35.0.19(b)(8) (authorizes special stealth design techniques where "particular sensitivity" findings apply). - Vote: Council approved monopine design 7-0; applicant may revert to monopole if geotechnical/feasibility study shows monopine infeasible; such a reversion requires staff verification.

Ending: Staff will include conditions in the project approval that capture the geotechnical feasibility requirement and the fallback process. The applicant and staff will proceed with the remaining ministerial review steps and any required permits.