Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Human Services topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Greenlee County approves $10,737 donation to Mount Graham Safe House for security system

6499274 · September 17, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The board approved a one‑time charitable donation to the Mount Graham Safe House to cover upfront costs for cameras and alarm installation; the donation covers an $10,737 installation estimate and does not include ongoing monitoring fees, which the transcript indicated would be about $35 monthly if enacted.

The Greenlee County Board of Supervisors approved a charitable donation of $10,737 to the Mount Graham Safe House to assist with initial security equipment and installation costs for a new safe‑house location in the county.

County management described the need: the safe house will provide secure, overnight accommodations and supportive services for individuals fleeing domestic violence; staff said upfront installation of cameras and door alarms is a priority for resident safety. County Manager Derek Rapier explained the county had not budgeted a designated donation specifically for this request and that the county retained a small “undesignated” donation fund; the board approved using available budget capacity for the security installation.

The $10,737 figure covered professional installation, configuration and testing of cameras and access controls; ongoing monthly monitoring (which the presenters referenced separately) would be approximately $35 per month and was not included in the immediate request. Supervisors moved and seconded a motion to fund the upfront security installation, and the motion passed by voice vote.

Board members who spoke described the donation as an investment in a locally based service that would reduce the need for survivors to travel outside the county for shelter and services. The board did not attach additional conditions to the donation; staff indicated other infrastructure needs (site pad, electrical, fencing) will be pursued through additional fundraising or grants.