Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Votes At A Glance topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
At a glance: Pittsylvania County board approves agenda, consent items and two rezoning requests
Summary
The Board of Supervisors approved the meeting agenda and consent agenda (including a corrected $20,749.50 refund), and unanimously approved two rezoning petitions: R-25-018 (0.528 acres A-1 to B-2) and R-25-020 (12.6881 acres R-1 to A-1).
At its Sept. 16 meeting in Chatham, the Pittsylvania County Board of Supervisors took several formal actions, approving the meeting agenda and consent agenda and granting two rezoning petitions in unanimous votes.
Votes at a glance
- Agenda approval: Motion to approve the meeting agenda carried unanimously. The motion was moved by Miss Bowman and seconded by Mister Ingram. The board did not record individual roll-call votes in the minutes; seven supervisors were present and voted yes.
- Consent agenda: The board approved the consent agenda unanimously after correcting a refund amount. County staff identified that Circle K had overpaid its taxes; the correct refund amount was set at $20,749.50. Mister Dalton moved to approve the consent agenda and Mister Dudley seconded; the motion carried unanimously.
- Rezoning Case R-25-018 (A & S Investments LLC): The board approved a petition to rezone 0.528 acres on State Road 718 (Drive Fork Road) in the Chatham Blair's Election District from A-1 (agricultural) to B-2 (general business) to allow consolidation with an adjacent B-2 parcel. The planning commission had recommended approval by a 5-0 vote on Aug. 5, 2025. Samantha Thomas represented the petitioner. The motion to approve was made by Mister Bowman and seconded by Mister Dudley; the motion passed unanimously.
- Rezoning Case R-25-020 (Jerry Barker): The board approved rezoning 12.6881 acres off State Road 671 (Midway Road) in the Banister Election District from R-1 (residential suburban subdivision) to A-1 (agricultural) to allow consolidation with an adjacent parcel. The planning commission had recommended approval by a 6-0 vote on Aug. 5, 2025. Jerry Barker represented the petition. Mister Dudley moved to approve and Mister Dalton seconded; the motion passed unanimously.
None of the rezoning items drew public opposition at the hearings; each hearing was opened and closed at the meeting after no members of the public signed up to speak. The board did not record individual roll-call vote details in the public transcript; the meeting record shows motions were adopted unanimously by the supervisors present.
