Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Emerging Issues topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
LCCMR adopts updated emerging-issues procedures, narrows eligibility and sets screening process
Summary
The commission adopted an updated policy for the ENRTF emerging issues account that sets screening procedures, narrows eligibility and clarifies unspent-fund treatment; the full commission will screen requests unless extraordinary circumstances warrant a subcommittee review.
The Legislative Citizen Commission on Minnesota Resources on July 18 adopted updated procedures for the Environment and Natural Resources Trust Fund emerging issues account, including an agreed screening approach, clarified eligibility criteria and a decision about unspent funds.
Screening process Commissioners voted to use a full-commission screening approach: staff will distribute request materials to all LCCMR members for evaluation and members will indicate whether they wish to hear a presentation; if a simple majority of responding members (with at least eight responses) request a presentation, staff will schedule the applicant to present at the next appropriate LCCMR meeting. Following presentations, the full commission votes on requests. Representative Heintzeman made the motion to adopt the screening approach; the measure passed by roll call.
Eligibility and priorities Director Nash proposed minimum eligibility criteria: (1) the request must address the constitutional purpose of the ENRTF (air, water, land, fish, wildlife or other natural resources); (2) the issue arose unexpectedly; (3) delay until the next regular funding cycle would cause significant detrimental impact to resources; and (4) the proposer is ready to implement the solution promptly if funds are provided. Members requested a tightening of item 3 to make the timeline explicit; Senator Westrom successfully moved to amend item 3 so that the potential significant detrimental impact must occur "before the next legislative session." The commission adopted the eligibility criteria with that amendment on a roll call.
Ineligibility and unspent funds The commission adopted language that, except in extraordinary circumstances, the following are ineligible for emerging-issues funding: land acquisition, capital construction, and research that requires peer review before funding (the extraordinary-circumstances clause allows exceptions where imminent loss or damage can be demonstrated). That motion passed on roll call.
The commission chose option 2 for treatment of unspent funds: if emerging-issues funds are not spent before the appropriation expiration and prior to the next legislative session, those dollars will return to the ENRTF corpus rather than being reallocated administratively.
Why it matters: the adopted procedures give applicants and staff clearer direction on what qualifies as an emergent or urgent need, how requests are screened and how unspent funds will be handled. The full-commission screening approach retains decisionmaking at the full commission level rather than delegating final screening to a subcommittee.
Votes: screening option 1 passed (roll call recorded), eligibility criteria with the amendment passed by roll call (15 yes, 1 no recorded on the motion to adopt criteria), ineligibility option passed (14 yes, 0 no), and the unspent-funds option 2 passed (15 yes, 0 no).
