Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Procurement Bids topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
City of Dallas opens bids for 10 construction and procurement projects
Summary
City of Dallas purchasing staff read submissions July 18 for three construction bid packages, one construction design-build request, several procurement contracts and Dallas Fire Rescue inventory software; no awards were announced.
City of Dallas purchasing staff opened and read bids on July 18 for 10 construction and procurement projects, listing firms and dollar amounts but taking no award actions.
The purchasing staff (name not specified) announced submissions for three construction bid packages for water and wastewater projects, a design-build request for Fire Station 5 improvements, four procurement bid packages for materials and services, one real estate brokerage request for proposal and one competitive sealed proposal for an inventory management solution for Dallas Fire Rescue. No vendors were selected during the bid opening.
Why it matters: these solicitations cover water and wastewater infrastructure, public-safety facility improvements, routine materials and testing services, and a technology procurement for Dallas Fire Rescue; the contracts, when awarded, will affect city vendors and future project timelines and costs.
The purchasing staff opened the first construction bid, CIZDashDWU25187188, for “McKay in Osage branch, wastewater interceptor, phase 1,” and read five bids: HB Trenchless LLC ($4,223,443), John Burns Construction ($53,150,551), McKay Utility Constructors LLC ($53,912,000), S J Lewis Construction of Texas ($39,144,257) and Southland Contracting Inc ($46,277,321).
The second construction bid, CIZDWU25091, for Cedardale Pressure Zone Improvements, drew bids from Flowline Construction Inc ($14,995,560), Harper Brothers Construction ($20,730,154), John Burns Construction ($16,828,507), SYB Construction Co., Inc. ($15,706,650) and WMC ($18,844,585).
The third construction bid, CIZDWU25181 (Hillcrest Road pump station house), included a submission from C L W Water Group (amounts read as $4,000,090 and $4,992,000 in the bid reading).
The purchasing staff also read a construction request for proposal, CIZ25BCM3156A, seeking design-build services for foundation, kitchen and mechanical/electrical/plumbing improvements at Fire Station 5; bidders listed included Big Sky Construction Company Inc and Cooper General Contractors.
Procurement bids read included BK2500027846 (small and large cast iron fittings) with respondents Core & Main LP and Fort Line Inc; BP2500026808 (aggregates) with respondents Chester Stone and Brock Company Inc, Green Dream International, Living Earth, Hugh Roberts Trucking and TJC Products; BH2500027734 (valves, valve parts and accessories) with respondents Ferguson Waterworks, JNS Valve, LG Space Engineering Corporation, Merler Co. LLC and PowerSeal; and BY2500027953 (drug and alcohol testing for DPD and DFR) with respondents BlueStar Diagnostics, CoverTech Inc, DATCO Services Corporation, DOT Medical and Drug Testing Services Inc, Jace Anthony LLC, ProSalutum, Texas Mobile Drug Testing, USA Mobile Drug Testing in Dallas and Plano.
The city read a procurement request for proposal BYZ2500027510 for real estate brokerage and consulting services with respondents Seabree Inc, Colliers, Cushman & Wakefield, Eureka Business Group, Jones Lang LaSalle Americas Inc (JLL), Moore Signing Services LLC, Realford Consulting LLC, Solovus Inc and US Realty Partners LLC.
A competitive sealed proposal, BYZ2500027697, sought a Dallas Fire Rescue inventory management solution; respondents read included Apex Consultants Inc, Apptricity Corporation, AssetWorks, Boundtree Medical LLC, Intelligenesia LLC, Ruja Enterprise LLC, Shipco Wireless Inc and ZPRO Solutions.
The bid opening concluded with purchasing staff saying the bid packets could be viewed later at the city’s website and no award or evaluation actions were announced during the session.
Notes: all dollar figures and company names were read aloud by purchasing staff during the bid opening. Award decisions, contract terms, evaluation criteria and funding sources were not stated during the reading and therefore are not reported here.
