Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the School Infrastructure Alternates topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Committee debates replacing three school lifts and a new elevator as alternates; decision deferred

5419979 · July 17, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Middletown building committee reviewed alternate pricing for Dahlia Elementary and discussed whether to replace three existing lifts and add a new two‑stop elevator; committee deferred a decision to gather principal input and await GMP cost confirmations.

The Middletown Building Committee on July 16 reviewed alternate pricing related to the elementary school complex (referred to in the meeting as Dahlia Elementary) and debated whether to replace three existing vertical lifts and whether to add a new two‑stop elevator adjacent to the nurse's suite.

Justin, an owner's representative, reported the new two‑stop elevator and associated infrastructure was priced at $733,701. He said the elevator noted in the estimate includes significant structural underpinning and infrastructure work. Justin also reported that replacing all three existing lifts was priced at about $138,000, separate from an amount already budgeted for repairs to the existing lifts.

Several committee members and staff weighed operation and accessibility factors. One member said the existing lifts are primarily used to move supplies and materials; custodial staff reported two lifts work consistently and one has occasional issues. Another member urged replacement now to avoid operational disruptions for staff and students, saying a modern, enclosed lift would serve either permanent or temporary mobility needs.

Sean Brown, the town administrator, and other committee members emphasized timing and phasing: roofing and other work tied to project phasing may require decisions months in advance to secure contractors and equipment. Justin recommended decisions about roofs be made by year end for summer work; lift replacements would require a several‑month lead time before the chosen construction summer.

The committee did not act on approvals at the meeting; members agreed to defer final decisions. Justin said the project team will gather input from principals (the high‑school principal was absent) and that more precise costs will be available as GMPs are finalized. The item will return to the committee agenda.