Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Administration Committees Governance topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Planning board to clarify committee delegates; board members debate MRPC payment and state battery storage guidance; meeting adjourns by roll call
Summary
Board discussed assigning representatives to town and regional committees (MRPC, MJTC, CIPC/CPC, EDC), affirmed need to confirm appointments with the select board, debated whether to draft a comment on state battery energy storage bills, and adjourned after a roll‑call vote.
The Hubbardston Planning Board on July 17 discussed assigning planning board members to town and regional committees, considered payment to the Montachusett Regional Planning Commission (MRPC) and debated whether to draft a letter in response to proposed state legislation about battery energy storage systems.
Committee representation: Chair (Planning Board) and members reviewed roles that planning board members traditionally fill, including the MRPC seat, the MJTC transportation alternate, a Capital Improvement Planning Committee (CIPC) seat, the Community Preservation Committee (CPC) representative and an Economic Development Committee (EDC) representative. Alec (Town Planner) and other members said those seats can be significant because representatives often learn about grant opportunities and advise on zoning and capital planning.
Board members noted some confusion about automatic re‑assignments. One member said he received notice from the town clerk that he had been assigned to the CIPC but advised that appointments are not final until the planning board formally chooses and presents nominees to the select board; members asked staff to follow up with the town administrator and Patricia (planning board member referenced as current alternate delegate).
MRPC payment and state battery storage bills: The board briefly discussed a circulated draft advocacy letter and pending legislative proposals related to battery energy storage. One member said he reviewed draft house bills and did not support broad one‑size‑fits‑all language; another member suggested drafting a short addendum urging the state to consider alternative battery technologies with lower toxicity and different risk profiles. Francois (Planning Board member) offered to review an existing letter from a nearby town and draft suggested language for the board to consider. The board agreed to consider placing a short item on a future agenda if members bring a draft.
Administrative payments and minutes: The board confirmed its minutes from the July 2 meeting were accepted earlier in the session (no roll‑call details recorded in the transcript). Members discussed that the MRPC membership payment is budgeted as a line item in the annual town budget; the chair asked for approval to pay it on the next accounts payable run.
Adjournment: A motion to adjourn was made, seconded and approved by roll call at 7:45 p.m.; Mr. Steiger and Mr. Carpenter each voted “aye,” and the chair recorded an “aye.”
Provenance: Discussion about committee representation and MRPC payment appears under agenda item 5(a) (planning board members serving on other roles) and administrative matters; the battery storage/advocacy letter discussion occurs under administrative matters; the adjournment roll call is at the end of the transcript.
