Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Equity Disparity Study topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Task force told disparity and capacity studies near completion; staff say recent state/federal guidance raises legal questions
Summary
Van Turner and county consultants said the disparity study is expected to conclude in August–September and the capacity study is essentially done; they also discussed how recent state guidance and an executive order intersect with U.S. Supreme Court precedent on race‑conscious contracting programs.
Van Turner (project staff) told the task force the disparity study should conclude in August or September, and that the capacity study is largely finished though the team asked for limited follow‑up work to account for recent changes in state and federal guidance.
Turner and Kim Brown discussed legal context: Turner said many practitioners rely on the U.S. Supreme Court ruling in City of Richmond v. J.A. Croson Co., which established that local governments must document disparities before adopting race‑conscious contracting programs. "What is relied upon is a case called City of Richmond versus Croson," Turner said, explaining why an executive order or new state guidance does not automatically replace the need for disparity evidence.
Why it matters: The disparity study is the evidentiary basis for supplier‑diversity programs that use race‑conscious measures. Task force members asked staff to ensure the disparity report and any amendments reflect recent legal and policy guidance so the county can withstand potential challenges.
What the task force heard and directed - Turner: the disparity study "should be concluding August, September" and the capacity study was effectively done but asked to be revisited to reflect new legal guidance. - Kim Brown: legal and executive guidance may prompt litigation and will have to be reconciled with existing Supreme Court precedent; county staff said they are preparing to document the analysis and will provide the reports to the task force.
Ending: Task force members requested delivery of the updated disparity and capacity reports; staff agreed to provide the documents to the committee and to respond to commissioner requests for additional detail.
