Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Disciplinary Review topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
DRB finds policy gaps in property handling, warrant-service guidance and conflict reporting; recommends DGO updates
Summary
The Disciplinary Review Board reviewed first-quarter cases and identified policy failures in property processing (DGO 6.15), warrant-service procedures (DGO 6.18) and conflict-of-interest guidance (DGO 2.01); DPA and IAD recommended updates and increased tracking.
The Police Commission received the Disciplinary Review Board's first-quarter findings on July 16, which identified several administrative-policy gaps the board said should be addressed in department general orders.
Lieutenant Lisa Springer of Internal Affairs and Sharon Wu, chief of staff, presented findings showing the top allegation categories for the quarter included conduct unbecoming and neglect of duty. The board identified three policy failures that it said warranted DGO updates or clearer operational guidance:
- Property processing (DGO 6.15): Two cases exposed gaps in how property booked for safekeeping (as distinct from evidentiary items) is logged and located. The DRB recommended revising DGO 6.15 to require clearer tagging, a searchable evidence/ property queue and guidance for timely return of safekeeping property to owners.
- Warrant-service procedures (DGO 6.18): In at least one case the warrant generated from a Special Victims Unit investigation sat with the warrant bureau and was not actively executed by the investigating unit; a suspect later fled the jurisdiction. The DRB recommended clearer rules about which unit serves certain warrants and improved coordination so victims are notified and sensitive cases receive prioritized service.
- Conflict reporting (DGO 2.01): The board recommended clarifying guidance on when officers must report potential conflicts, including indirect or familial ties between victims and the officer's family, to reduce ambiguity over disclosure and recusal.
The board recommended department bulletins and DGO revisions to address each issue and asked command staff to incorporate the DRB recommendations. The Office of Equity and Inclusion reviewed the cases and found no further corrective-action disparities; the DRB said it will schedule a Q2 review next.
Why it matters: The recommendations seek to tighten internal procedures that affect evidence handling, victim protection and officer accountability. The commission will monitor the department's implementation of the suggested DGO revisions.
Next steps: The DRB recommended publishing departmental bulletins with interim guidance and updating DGO 6.15 and 6.18; the commission will follow up as those revisions are developed.
