Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Insurance Risk Management topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Board briefed on risk‑management RFP: consultant explains differences between insurance markets and associational pools
Summary
A consultant explained tradeoffs between traditional insurance and associational pools as the district issues an RFP for property, liability and workers' compensation coverage; board members asked about geographic spread, financial safeguards and assessment risk.
Board members received an informational report on July 15 about the district’s ongoing request for proposals for property, liability and workers’ compensation coverage and heard a detailed discussion about the tradeoffs between traditional insurance and associational pools.
Matt (district risk staff) introduced James Charlesworth of Charlesworth Consulting, who outlined the structural differences: a traditional insured policy is regulated, form‑based and backed by rated carriers, while an associational pool (also called a trust) is a member‑run risk‑sharing vehicle in which members pay contributions that fund a pooled loss account and buy reinsurance above that retention.
“Pools and trusts are different than insurance,” Charlesworth said. “They are member focused. You are sharing the risk with your fellow members.” He explained that pools typically allocate about 70% of contributions to the loss fund and the remainder to reinsurance, administration and claim handling, and that a district joining a pool accepts potential post‑year assessments if losses exceed reserves and reinsurance recoveries.
Board members asked several clarifying questions. Dr. Warticke asked whether the pool under consideration would include only Missouri school districts and whether a statewide disaster could trigger assessments. Charlesworth said property losses are spread across members and reinsurance layers, observed that pool limits and reinsurance contracts matter, and urged careful review of a pool’s audited financials, actuarial reports and bylaws before joining.
Other questions included whether the pool covers professional liability and D&O, withdrawal notice rules and membership size. Charlesworth said members typically must give formal notice to withdraw, some pools require multi‑year commitments, and dispute resolution and governance provisions vary by pool.
District staff said the RFP will compare traditional fully insured proposals from insurers/brokers against the associational pool option and will return to the board with a recommendation at the scheduled September meeting. Staff and the consultant said the analysis will include a financial review of the pool’s audited statements and actuarial reserves, membership composition and governance and withdrawal conditions.
This was an informational briefing; no vote or contract award occurred at the meeting.
