Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Parks Capital Projects topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Commission debates proposed outdoor fitness installation; concerns about footprint, liability and target users
Summary
Commissioners reviewed a proposal for outdoor exercise equipment (approx. 78x38 feet) and expressed concerns about location, large footprint, potential injury risks, and whether the equipment serves the town's priority populations; no vote taken.
The Park Commission discussed a draft proposal to install outdoor fitness equipment at a Town park — the vendor drawings show a large footprint (about 78 feet by 38 feet) — and commissioners raised questions about the proposed location, liability and how widely the equipment would be used.
Commissioners said the proposed siting (one recommended location was near the wedding venue and across from the lodge) would conflict with other park uses such as TriFest and markets; they suggested alternative siting near the tennis courts or the former ice‑skating rink area. Concerns focused on the size of the installation, which could preclude other uses: "By doing that, you're designating that space to that activity," one commissioner said.
Several commissioners also raised safety concerns for unsupervised users and older residents attempting complex equipment. "People are gonna be, you know, on their own with this equipment and you could get really injured," a commissioner said. Commissioners suggested signage ("use at your own risk") and noted that some towns have similar setups near multipurpose fields.
Funding conversations included potential Community Preservation Committee (CPC) grants covering a portion of capital cost, with town contributions making up the remainder. Commissioners discussed the program's benefits for parents and adults but questioned whether the installation would serve a broad segment of Lakeville's youth, and recommended further outreach, alternate locations and a review of equipment that minimizes injury risk before forwarding a recommendation to town leadership for potential CPC funding.
No formal motion or vote was taken; commissioners asked staff to identify alternate sites, consider multi‑use impacts and gather additional information on liability and usage patterns.
