Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Legal Settlements topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Commissioners approve conditional settlement in Collin County v. 547 Land Development and authorize TxDOT condemnation settlement
Summary
Returning from closed session, the court voted to approve two legal settlements: a conditional settlement in Collin County v. 547 Land Development LLC and authorization to settle a TxDOT condemnation suit under a mediated agreement.
Get email alerts on the Legal Settlements topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Returning from closed session, the court voted on two legal settlements discussed in executive session.
On the first motion, a commissioner moved to conditionally approve the offer presented to settle Collin County v. 547 Land Development LLC in the 490th District Court. The court approved the settlement “except that we cannot waive any claims regarding alleged pond or dam failures or demands for corrections.” The motion carried on a voice vote.
On a separate motion, the court authorized settlement of a Texas Department of Transportation (TxDOT) condemnation suit “pursuant to the terms of the mediated settlement agreement.” That motion also passed on a voice vote.
Court members said they did not take any action while in executive session; both motions were made and approved in open session following the closed discussion. The transcript records the motions and that both were adopted, but does not state the monetary amounts or the detailed terms of either mediated agreement; the court clerk or county counsel will maintain the formal settlement documents.
Clarifying details noted in the meeting record: the Collin County case is styled Collin County v. 547 Land Development LLC and is pending in the 490th District Court; the settlement was approved “for the amount offered,” but the specific amount was not read into the public record during the open-session motions. The TxDOT condemnation settlement was authorized under a mediated settlement agreement; again, specific monetary terms were not specified on the record.
The court said no action was taken in closed session and that follow-up motions would be handled in open session. The court proceeded with other agenda items after approving the settlements.
