Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Ethics topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Denton Board of Ethics finds complaint processing averages about 30 days; no timetable changes for now
Summary
Staff told the board that, since Oct. 1, 2020, eight complaints were filed (four accepted), the typical processing time has been roughly 30 days, and members agreed existing timelines are working though vacancies slow scheduling.
The Denton Board of Ethics reviewed administrative timelines for handling submitted ethics complaints and heard staff say the average processing time has been about 30 calendar days.
Staff reported that since Oct. 1, 2020, eight ethics complaints were received; four were considered administratively abandoned for missing corrections, and four were accepted as administratively complete. Of those accepted, three moved to a hearing. The average elapsed time from intake through resolution in practice has been a little more than 30 days; the ordinance allows a longer maximum timeline that includes administrative corrections and posting windows.
Staff outlined the ordinance timelines: up to 14 calendar days for initial administrative review, 21 calendar days for a preliminary panel/assessment, and 30 calendar days to schedule an evidentiary hearing — with the total maximum varying if corrections and re-submissions occur. In practice staff said initial completeness checks typically take two calendar days, panel assessments usually occur within about 10 days, and hearings are scheduled within about 21 days.
Board members said the constraint on scheduling is chiefly the availability of panel members and vacancies on the board rather than staff processing time. One member noted a legislative change extending public-posting timelines could lengthen processing times in the future.
The board did not vote to change the timelines and directed staff to continue current practices while emphasizing the need for council appointments to fill board vacancies to reduce scheduling delays.
Next steps: board asked staff to monitor impacts of any state or municipal posting-law changes and to report back if average processing times rise.
